[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v16 2/2] eal: support for VFIO-PCI VF token

[Wang, Haiyue]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Marchand <david.marchand at redhat.com>
> Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2020 15:33
> To: Harman Kalra <hkalra at marvell.com>; Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj at marvell.com>
> Cc: Wang, Haiyue <haiyue.wang at intel.com>; dev <dev at dpdk.org>; Burakov, Anatoly
> <anatoly.burakov at intel.com>; Thomas Monjalon <thomas at monjalon.net>; Andrew Rybchenko
> <arybchenko at solarflare.com>; Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin at redhat.com>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v16 2/2] eal: support for VFIO-PCI VF token
> 
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 10:40 PM Harman Kalra <hkalra at marvell.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 02:33:21PM +0800, Haiyue Wang wrote:
> > > The kernel module vfio-pci introduces the VF token to enable SR-IOV
> > > support since 5.7.
> > >
> > > The VF token can be set by a vfio-pci based PF driver and must be known
> > > by the vfio-pci based VF driver in order to gain access to the device.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Haiyue Wang <haiyue.wang at intel.com>
> > > Acked-by: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov at intel.com>
> > > Acked-by: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko at solarflare.com>
> > > ---
> >
> > Tested-by: Harman Kalra <hkalra at marvell.com>
> 
> Thanks for the test Harman.
> 
> I can see no complaint on using a single token for all devices, which

Yeah, not the best, but may meet with the most needed: create VFs by vfio-pci ;-)

Since devarg was a private option for ALL kind of devices, and have to break the
ABI policy to implement the design, so I drop this revision, choose to use it as
a global option as "vfio-intr" option does.

> is the only concern I would have with the last revision.
> If everyone is ok with this choice, I will take this for -rc1.
> 
> 
> --
> David Marchand