[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/5] app/test-flow-perf: add flow performance skeleton

Wisam Monther wisamm at mellanox.com
Tue May 5 12:45:57 CEST 2020


>-----Original Message-----
>From: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko at solarflare.com>
>Sent: Monday, May 4, 2020 1:17 PM
>To: Wisam Monther <wisamm at mellanox.com>; dev at dpdk.org; Jack Min
><jackmin at mellanox.com>; Thomas Monjalon <thomas at monjalon.net>;
>jerinjacobk at gmail.com; gerlitz.or at gmail.com; l.yan at epfl.ch
>Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/5] app/test-flow-perf: add flow
>performance skeleton
>
>On 4/30/20 1:33 PM, Wisam Jaddo wrote:
>> Add flow performance application skeleton.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wisam Jaddo <wisamm at mellanox.com>
>> ---
>>  MAINTAINERS                          |   5 +
>>  app/Makefile                         |   1 +
>>  app/meson.build                      |   1 +
>>  app/test-flow-perf/Makefile          |  26 +++
>>  app/test-flow-perf/main.c            | 246 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  app/test-flow-perf/meson.build       |  11 ++
>>  app/test-flow-perf/user_parameters.h |  16 ++
>>  config/common_base                   |   5 +
>>  doc/guides/tools/flow-perf.rst       |  69 ++++++++
>>  doc/guides/tools/index.rst           |   1 +
>>  10 files changed, 381 insertions(+)
>>  create mode 100644 app/test-flow-perf/Makefile  create mode 100644
>> app/test-flow-perf/main.c  create mode 100644
>> app/test-flow-perf/meson.build  create mode 100644
>> app/test-flow-perf/user_parameters.h
>>  create mode 100644 doc/guides/tools/flow-perf.rst
>>
>> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index d31a809292..b5632c1bf5
>> 100644
>> --- a/MAINTAINERS
>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
>> @@ -1504,6 +1504,11 @@ T: git://dpdk.org/next/dpdk-next-net
>>  F: app/test-pmd/
>>  F: doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/
>>
>> +Flow performance tool
>> +M: Wisam Jaddo <wisamm at mellanox.com>
>> +F: app/test-flow-perf
>> +F: doc/guides/flow-perf.rst
>> +
>
>Shouldn't it be alphabetially sorted? I think by app name.

It looks no,
Current order:
- Sample_packet_forward
- test-pmd
- comp_perf
- eventdev
- proc-info

So I'll move the new app to be in the end of the test apps, since it's been added last, is this ok?



More information about the dev mailing list