[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] test/service: add perf test for service on app lcore

[David Marchand]

On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 8:29 AM Phil Yang <Phil.Yang at arm.com> wrote:
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Harry van Haaren <harry.van.haaren at intel.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, May 7, 2020 1:17 AM
> > To: dev at dpdk.org
> > Cc: david.marchand at redhat.com; Phil Yang <Phil.Yang at arm.com>;
> > Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli at arm.com>; Harry van Haaren
> > <harry.van.haaren at intel.com>
> > Subject: [PATCH v2] test/service: add perf test for service on app lcore
> >
> > This commit adds a basic test to check the cycle cost
> > of related to calling into a service.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Harry van Haaren <harry.van.haaren at intel.com>
> >
> > ---
> >
> > v2:
> > - Add space at start of output (Phil Yang)
> > - Fix compile error on older GCCs (David Marchand)
> >
> > ---
> >  app/test/test_service_cores.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/app/test/test_service_cores.c b/app/test/test_service_cores.c
> > index a922c7ddc..75a3f8b45 100644
> > --- a/app/test/test_service_cores.c
> > +++ b/app/test/test_service_cores.c
> > @@ -789,8 +789,19 @@ service_app_lcore_poll_impl(const int mt_safe)
> >                               "MT Unsafe: App core1 didn't return -
> > EBUSY");
> >       }
> >
> > -     unregister_all();
> > +     /* Performance test: call in a loop, and measure tsc() */
> > +     uint32_t i;
> > +     const uint32_t perf_iters = (1 << 12);
> > +     uint64_t start = rte_rdtsc();
> > +     for (i = 0; i < perf_iters; i++) {
> > +             int err = service_run_on_app_core_func(&id);
> > +             TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(0, err, "perf test: returned run failure");
> > +     }
> > +     uint64_t end = rte_rdtsc();
> > +     printf("\t\tperf test for %s: %0.1f cycles per call\n", mt_safe ?
>
> This print will be printed before the function test result.
> Apologize for my previous comments. Please ignore it.
>
> A nitpick comment on formatting the output.
>
> -       printf("\t\tperf test for %s: %0.1f cycles per call\n", mt_safe ?
> +       printf("Perf test for %-10s: %0.1f cycles per call\n", mt_safe ?
>
>
> Tested-by: Phil Yang <phil.yang at arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Phil Yang <phil.yang at arm.com>

Ok, so I will restore this part from the v1 when applying.


-- 
David Marchand