[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 00/58] net: txgbe PMD

[Jiawen Wu]

On Thursday, November 5, 2020 9:55 AM, Jiawen Wu wrote:
> On Thursday, November 5, 2020 1:24 AM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> > On 11/3/2020 11:08 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > 27/10/2020 12:37, Ferruh Yigit:
> > >> On 10/27/2020 2:39 AM, Jiawen Wu wrote:
> > >>> On Monday, October 26, 2020 10:56 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> > >>>> Series applied to dpdk-next-net/main, thanks.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> 57/58 & 58/58 has been distributed to the relevant commits while
> > >>>> merging, please double check them in the upstream repo.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> 56/58 & 53/58 has been dropped while merging.
> > >>>>     56/58 needs a new version which can be send individually,
> > >>>>     53/58 is adding a deprecated feature, it can't go in as it is.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Also can you please send a patch for the comment mentioned in 38/58?
> > >>>
> > >>> I will send two additional patches, one as a new version for
> > >>> 56/58, the
> > other one to fix 'rte_panic()'.
> > >
> > > When pulling in the main branch, I see some checkpatches warnings
> > > (in order of criticality):
> > > 	Using rte_smp_[r/w]mb
> > > 	Using rte_panic/rte_exit
> > > 	Using compiler attribute directly
> > >
> > > Please could you fix them (at least first two) before the second series?
> > >
> >
> > Hi Jiawen, Jian,
> >
> > I would like to double check if above request is clear, and if it is OK in your
> end?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > ferruh
> 
> Sorry I did not see this message, I will add a patch to fix this problem today.

I saw ' rte_smp_*mb ' is in the deprecation notices, but there is no function
can be an alternative.
I would like to use 'rte_atomic_thread_fence(__ATOMIC_ACQUIRE)' to replace
'rte_smp_rmb()', is it the correct usage?