[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] bus/dpaa: optimize device name parsing
David Marchand
david.marchand at redhat.com
Mon Nov 9 12:58:13 CET 2020
On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 12:32 PM Gaetan Rivet <grive at u256.net> wrote:
> + delta = 0;
> + if (strncmp(name, "dpaa_bus:", 9) == 0) {
> + delta = 9;
> + } else if (strncmp(name, "name=", 5) == 0) {
> + delta = 5;
> + }
> +
> + if (sscanf(&name[delta], "fm%u-mac%u", &i, &j) == 2) {
> + if (i >= 2 || j >= 16)
> + return -EINVAL;
> + if (out != NULL) {
> + char *out_name = out;
> +
> + if (rte_strscpy(out_name, &name[delta], 10) < 0)
> + return -ENAMETOOLONG;
> + /* Because 'i' can only be 0 or 1, fm%u is fixed size ;
> + * mac%u needs to be checked for optional end ','.
> + */
> + if (out_name[9] == ',')
> + out_name[9] = '\0';
> }
> + return 0;
> + } else {
> + return -EINVAL;
> }
Mmm, we always return from each of the previous branches?
Then the ENODEV return after is dead code.
Reading again the diff, you could probably return at the sscanf step.
if (sscanf(&name[delta], "fm%u-mac%u", &i, &j) != 2 || i >= 2 || j >= 16)
return -EINVAL;
>
> - free(dup_name);
> - return -EINVAL;
> + return -ENODEV;
> }
>
> #define DPAA_DEV_PATH1 "/sys/devices/platform/soc/soc:fsl,dpaa"
--
David Marchand
More information about the dev
mailing list