[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 07/14] build: isolate configuration for generic build

Juraj Linkeš juraj.linkes at pantheon.tech
Fri Nov 13 15:22:32 CET 2020



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas at monjalon.net>
> Sent: Friday, November 13, 2020 3:18 PM
> To: Juraj Linkeš <juraj.linkes at pantheon.tech>
> Cc: bruce.richardson at intel.com; Ruifeng.Wang at arm.com;
> Honnappa.Nagarahalli at arm.com; Phil.Yang at arm.com;
> vcchunga at amazon.com; Dharmik.Thakkar at arm.com; jerinjacobk at gmail.com;
> hemant.agrawal at nxp.com; ajit.khaparde at broadcom.com;
> ferruh.yigit at intel.com; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 07/14] build: isolate configuration for generic
> build
> 
> 13/11/2020 15:03, Juraj Linkeš:
> > From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas at monjalon.net>
> > > 11/11/2020 14:18, Juraj Linkeš:
> > > > Use generic configuration for the only build where it makes sense
> > > > - the generic build. For other builds, if we don't know either of
> > > > implementer ID or part number, the build is not supported.
> > > > Add part numbers to cross files where fallback to generic
> > > > configuration is assumed.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Juraj Linkeš <juraj.linkes at pantheon.tech>
> > >
> > > It fails for config/arm/arm64_dpaa_linux_gcc:
> > > config/arm/meson.build:223:2: ERROR: Unknown cross property:
> part_number.
> > >
> > > Are you testing all platforms in config/arm/?
> > >
> >
> > I've tested this, but I forgot to fix it when I learned what the proper
> part_number should be. It works with all the patches in the series, but I can add
> it here as well if you want me to.
> 
> All patches must compile please.
> I'm afraid it will make this series deferred to later.
> 
> 

I can send a fixed version right away.


More information about the dev mailing list