[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] kernel/linux: remove igb_uio
Ferruh Yigit
ferruh.yigit at intel.com
Tue Oct 6 13:09:17 CEST 2020
On 10/6/2020 11:54 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 06/10/2020 12:16, Ferruh Yigit:
>> On 10/5/2020 10:42 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>>> As decided in the Technical Board in November 2019,
>>> the kernel module igb_uio is moved to the dpdk-kmods repository
>>> in the /linux/igb_uio/ directory.
>
> [...]
>> Patch doesn't apply cleanly, not sure why, CI seems having same problem:
>> http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/2020-October/156378.html
>
> That's because I used --irreversible-delete to minimize the size of the patch.
>
> [...]
>>> If UEFI secure boot is enabled, the Linux kernel may disallow the use of
>>> UIO on the system. Therefore, devices for use by DPDK should be bound to the
>>> - ``vfio-pci`` kernel module rather than ``igb_uio`` or ``uio_pci_generic``.
>>> + ``vfio-pci`` kernel module rather than any UIO-based module.
>>> For more details see :ref:`linux_gsg_binding_kernel` below.
>>
>> Should we change the order of the kernel drivers, currently first section is
>> "UIO" and second section is "VFIO". Since we encoruage vfio and move igb_uio out
>> of the repo, should we list the "VfIO" first?
>
> Absolutely.
> In general we need to encourage more VFIO and remove some references
> to igb_uio. But I don't want to do such "marketing" change in this patch.
> The goal of this patch is just to move the code.
>
OK.
> [...]
>>> +* kernel: The module ``igb_uio`` has been moved to the git repository
>>> +``dpdk-kmods`` in a new directory ``linux/igb_uio``.
>>> +
>>
>> Doc build giving warning on this:
>> WARNING: Bullet list ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent.
>
> Probably a merge issue. That's fine on my side.
>
I can see it is wrong in the patch itself, please double check in your end to be
sure warning is not hidden in doc build.
I am good as long as there is no warning.
>> Except from above minor comments looks good to me,
>> Reviewed-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit at intel.com>
>
> Do we agree I can merge without any change?
>
Agree if the above doc warning is gone.
More information about the dev
mailing list