[dpdk-dev] [EXT] Re: [PATCH 1/1] eal: increase TRACE CTF SIZE to recommended size

David Marchand david.marchand at redhat.com
Wed Oct 7 14:34:29 CEST 2020


On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 12:07 PM Sunil Kumar Kori <skori at marvell.com> wrote:
>> it is on a slow path. 448 is OK.
> >
> >Ah yes, this is for the ctf description.
> >Could it be changed to rely on dynamic allocations and we simply remove this
> >limit?
> Changing it to dynamic allocation is difficult because if we do this then every time memory is to reallocated.
> So IMO, It is okay to keep it static with enough size.

Ok.
I will take this as a ack from both Jerin and you and push with the
suggested commitlog.


-- 
David Marchand



More information about the dev mailing list