[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 00/31] remove make support in DPDK

Thomas Monjalon thomas at monjalon.net
Tue Sep 15 17:44:01 CEST 2020


15/09/2020 17:08, Power, Ciara:
> Hi David,
> 
> 
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: David Marchand <david.marchand at redhat.com>
> >Sent: Tuesday 15 September 2020 15:03
> >To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas at monjalon.net>; Chautru, Nicolas
> ><nicolas.chautru at intel.com>
> >Cc: Richardson, Bruce <bruce.richardson at intel.com>; dev <dev at dpdk.org>;
> >Power, Ciara <ciara.power at intel.com>
> >Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/31] remove make support in DPDK
> >
> >On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 11:05 AM Thomas Monjalon <thomas at monjalon.net>
> >wrote:
> >>
> >> 08/09/2020 10:16, Bruce Richardson:
> >> > On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 12:06:40AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> >> > > The first 13 commits of this series are pushed to the main branch,
> >> > > making the make-based build an old story.
> >> > >
> >> > > The last 18 commits (devtools, app and doc) are pending for more
> >> > > reviews, especially because the doc rework is still in progress.
> >> > > This is a big change which requires to be split but must be
> >> > > completed soon.
> >> > > *All*, please make the documentation update your highest priority.
> >> > > I will be reluctant to merge some driver changes if the related
> >> > > doc is not updated.
> >> > >
> >> > Thanks for the apply of the code patches, I think it will make all
> >> > our subsequent patch submissions a bit cleaner.
> >> >
> >> > In terms of docs, I believe the Linux and FreeBSD GSG guides to be
> >> > ready for merge, or if not 100% they are at least good enough IMHO
> >> > to be applied now and have some minor tweaks in subsequent patches
> >> > later. While I'm sure the Linux GSG could do with more major rework,
> >> > that should be separate from the doc updates in this patch.
> >>
> >> Of course I am not expecting any major rework in these patches, but I
> >> don't want to apply clean-up half done, which can drop some relevant
> >> informations or introduce mistakes.
> >>
> >> I will review the Linux and FreeBSD user guides first, as you suggest.
> >
> >I could not find a patch in patchwork for app/test-bbdev/test-bbdev.py which
> >still references RTE_SDK and RTE_TARGET.
> >
> >
> >--
> >David Marchand
> 
> 
> Changes to test-bbdev.py were made in patch 15: https://patchwork.dpdk.org/patch/76796/ to remove the references to RTE_SDK and RTE_TARGET.

I did not merge this patch because it is hardcoding "build" as a directory.
I'm sure we can do better.




More information about the dev mailing list