[dpdk-dev] [EXT] Re: [PATCH] net/bnx2x: enhance old ethdev close behavior

Thomas Monjalon thomas at monjalon.net
Sat Sep 26 13:40:53 CEST 2020


25/09/2020 21:24, Rasesh Mody:
> Hi Thomas,
> 
> >From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas at monjalon.net>
> >Sent: Friday, September 25, 2020 12:11 AM
> >
> >25/09/2020 06:17, Rasesh Mody:
> >> Set RTE_ETH_DEV_CLOSE_REMOVE upon probe so all the private resources
> >> for the port can be freed by rte_eth_dev_close(). With this change the
> >> private port resources are released in the .dev_close callback.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Rasesh Mody <rmody at marvell.com>
> >> ---
> >>  static int eth_bnx2x_dev_uninit(struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev)  {
> >> -	/* mac_addrs must not be freed alone because part of dev_private */
> >> -	eth_dev->data->mac_addrs = NULL;
> >> +	struct bnx2x_softc *sc = eth_dev->data->dev_private;
> >> +
> >> +	PMD_INIT_FUNC_TRACE(sc);
> >> +
> >> +	/* only uninitialize in the primary process */
> >> +	if (rte_eal_process_type() != RTE_PROC_PRIMARY)
> >> +		return 0;
> >> +
> >> +	bnx2x_dev_close(eth_dev);
> >
> >The check for primary process should be in the close function.
> >
> PMDs check for primary process as part of PCI probe, hence it was put in as part of PCI remove. I also observed other PMDs implementing a similar scheme.

Yes I am reviewing other PMDs to fix the same.

> If it needs to be part of close function, I can move it there.

Yes please.

> >About the title, I would suggest net/bnx2x: release port upon close
> >
> I'll change the title and resubmit.

Thanks




More information about the dev mailing list