[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 5/6] test/crypto: dynamically build blockcipher suite
Power, Ciara
ciara.power at intel.com
Fri Apr 2 16:34:06 CEST 2021
Hi Akhil,
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Akhil Goyal <gakhil at marvell.com>
>Sent: Wednesday 31 March 2021 15:46
>To: Power, Ciara <ciara.power at intel.com>; dev at dpdk.org
>Cc: Doherty, Declan <declan.doherty at intel.com>; hemant.agrawal at nxp.com;
>Anoob Joseph <anoobj at marvell.com>; ruifeng.wang at arm.com;
>asomalap at amd.com; ajit.khaparde at broadcom.com; g.singh at nxp.com;
>aconole at redhat.com
>Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 5/6] test/crypto: dynamically build
>blockcipher suite
>
>Hi Ciara,
>
>Nice work. I have below comment on the output of the results.
>
>++ more crypto PMD maintainers.
>
>> In the existing implementation, the blockcipher test cases are being
>> run and reported as one test case per type, even though multiple test
>> cases are hidden in each. For example, "test_AES_chain_all" runs 46 test
>cases.
>> Each blockcipher type should have a testsuite instead.
>>
>> The blockcipher testsuite is dynamically built, depending on the
>> blockcipher type chosen. The testcase struct is modified to allow
>> running a testcase with data, which is used for data required when
>> running each blockcipher testcase.
>>
>> The blockcipher testsuites are added dynamically to parent testsuites
>> as sub-testsuites where needed.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ciara Power <ciara.power at intel.com>
>> ---
>When I run the patchset, The output I got is
>+ Sub Testsuites Total : 24
> + Sub Testsuites Skipped : 2
> + Sub Testsuites Passed : 22
> + Sub Testsuites Failed : 0
>
>Is it possible for you to give more details in the end like Number of tests
>passed/failed/skipped/unsupported as well for each of the suite.
>
>The reason is that, people normally check the report in the end.
>For example:
>Crypto General(A/X passed, B/X skipped, C/X failed) //one line for each of the
>suite.
>
>
>Regards,
>Akhil
Yes, that is a good suggestion.
I have added this extra detail in the v2.
https://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=16085
Thanks!
More information about the dev
mailing list