[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] test/crypto: close PMD after tests
Akhil Goyal
gakhil at marvell.com
Mon Apr 5 20:58:37 CEST 2021
Hi Adam/Arek,
Could you please reply to the below query.
> > This patch adds closing of the PMD after running the tests.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Adam Dybkowski <adamx.dybkowski at intel.com>
> > ---
> > app/test/test_cryptodev.c | 6 +++++-
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/app/test/test_cryptodev.c b/app/test/test_cryptodev.c
> > index f91debc16..ea965a64a 100644
> > --- a/app/test/test_cryptodev.c
> > +++ b/app/test/test_cryptodev.c
> > @@ -928,6 +928,7 @@ ut_teardown(void)
> > struct crypto_testsuite_params *ts_params = &testsuite_params;
> > struct crypto_unittest_params *ut_params = &unittest_params;
> > struct rte_cryptodev_stats stats;
> > + int res;
> >
> > /* free crypto session structure */
> > #ifdef RTE_LIB_SECURITY
> > @@ -976,8 +977,11 @@ ut_teardown(void)
> >
> > rte_cryptodev_stats_get(ts_params->valid_devs[0], &stats);
> >
> > - /* Stop the device */
> > + /* Stop and close the device */
> > rte_cryptodev_stop(ts_params->valid_devs[0]);
> > + res = rte_cryptodev_close(ts_params->valid_devs[0]);
> > + if (res)
> > + RTE_LOG(ERR, USER1, "Crypto device close error %d\n", res);
>
> Shouldn't this be part of testsuite_setup() instead of ut_teardown()?
> In cases of vdev, devices are initialized as part of testsuite_setup().
>
> Should we also call rte_cryptodev_queue_pair_release from ut_teardown?
>
> Regards,
> Akhil
More information about the dev
mailing list