[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 5/6] doc: add list of supported Field IDs to modify
Alexander Kozyrev
akozyrev at nvidia.com
Thu Apr 8 05:20:10 CEST 2021
Makes sense, Ferruh, I've send v2 without code snippet. Would you mind to take a look?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit at intel.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2021 11:53
> To: Alexander Kozyrev <akozyrev at nvidia.com>; dev at dpdk.org
> Cc: Raslan Darawsheh <rasland at nvidia.com>; Slava Ovsiienko
> <viacheslavo at nvidia.com>; Matan Azrad <matan at nvidia.com>; Ori Kam
> <orika at nvidia.com>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 5/6] doc: add list of supported Field IDs to
> modify
>
> On 3/24/2021 3:04 PM, Alexander Kozyrev wrote:
> > Include the rte_flow_field_id enumeration into the
> > documentation to provide the full list of all supported
> > Field IDs available for the MODIFY_FIELD RTE action.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alexander Kozyrev <akozyrev at nvidia.com>
> > ---
> > doc/guides/prog_guide/rte_flow.rst | 45
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> > 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/doc/guides/prog_guide/rte_flow.rst
> b/doc/guides/prog_guide/rte_flow.rst
> > index 62a57919eb..4265b7bfb8 100644
> > --- a/doc/guides/prog_guide/rte_flow.rst
> > +++ b/doc/guides/prog_guide/rte_flow.rst
> > @@ -2784,6 +2784,41 @@ can be used as both source and destination
> fields as set by ``field``.
> > The immediate value ``RTE_FLOW_FIELD_VALUE`` (or a pointer to it
> > ``RTE_FLOW_FIELD_POINTER``) is allowed as a source only.
> > ``RTE_FLOW_FIELD_START`` is used to point to the beginning of a packet.
> > +See ``enum rte_flow_field_id`` for the list of supported fields:
> > +
> > +.. code-block:: c
> > +
> > + enum rte_flow_field_id {
> > + RTE_FLOW_FIELD_START = 0, /**< Start of a packet. */
> > + RTE_FLOW_FIELD_MAC_DST, /**< Destination MAC Address. */
> > + RTE_FLOW_FIELD_MAC_SRC, /**< Source MAC Address. */
> > + RTE_FLOW_FIELD_VLAN_TYPE, /**< 802.1Q Tag Identifier. */
> > + RTE_FLOW_FIELD_VLAN_ID, /**< 802.1Q VLAN Identifier. */
> > + RTE_FLOW_FIELD_MAC_TYPE, /**< EtherType. */
> > + RTE_FLOW_FIELD_IPV4_DSCP, /**< IPv4 DSCP. */
> > + RTE_FLOW_FIELD_IPV4_TTL, /**< IPv4 Time To Live. */
> > + RTE_FLOW_FIELD_IPV4_SRC, /**< IPv4 Source Address. */
> > + RTE_FLOW_FIELD_IPV4_DST, /**< IPv4 Destination Address. */
> > + RTE_FLOW_FIELD_IPV6_DSCP, /**< IPv6 DSCP. */
> > + RTE_FLOW_FIELD_IPV6_HOPLIMIT, /**< IPv6 Hop Limit. */
> > + RTE_FLOW_FIELD_IPV6_SRC, /**< IPv6 Source Address. */
> > + RTE_FLOW_FIELD_IPV6_DST, /**< IPv6 Destination Address. */
> > + RTE_FLOW_FIELD_TCP_PORT_SRC, /**< TCP Source Port Number.
> */
> > + RTE_FLOW_FIELD_TCP_PORT_DST, /**< TCP Destination Port
> Number. */
> > + RTE_FLOW_FIELD_TCP_SEQ_NUM, /**< TCP Sequence Number. */
> > + RTE_FLOW_FIELD_TCP_ACK_NUM, /**< TCP Acknowledgment
> Number. */
> > + RTE_FLOW_FIELD_TCP_FLAGS, /**< TCP Flags. */
> > + RTE_FLOW_FIELD_UDP_PORT_SRC, /**< UDP Source Port Number.
> */
> > + RTE_FLOW_FIELD_UDP_PORT_DST, /**< UDP Destination Port
> Number. */
> > + RTE_FLOW_FIELD_VXLAN_VNI, /**< VXLAN Network Identifier. */
> > + RTE_FLOW_FIELD_GENEVE_VNI, /**< GENEVE Network Identifier.
> */
> > + RTE_FLOW_FIELD_GTP_TEID, /**< GTP Tunnel Endpoint
> Identifier. */
> > + RTE_FLOW_FIELD_TAG, /**< Tag value. */
> > + RTE_FLOW_FIELD_MARK, /**< Mark value. */
> > + RTE_FLOW_FIELD_META, /**< Metadata value. */
> > + RTE_FLOW_FIELD_POINTER, /**< Memory pointer. */
> > + RTE_FLOW_FIELD_VALUE, /**< Immediate value. */
> > + };
>
> The code in the documentation proved to be problem in long term, they get
> out of
> date most of the times. So what do you think to just keep the reference to
> ``enum rte_flow_field_id`` but drop the code block?
>
> Dropping the patch in next-net, it can be sent later separately.
More information about the dev
mailing list