[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/5] net/mlx5: add mlx5 APIs for single flow dump feature
Haifei Luo
haifeil at nvidia.com
Tue Apr 13 09:22:24 CEST 2021
HI Slava,
Yes for "we define 36/72 bytes array?".
Correction for my last comment, not byte , and it is one "int" for port_id , 8 "int" for flowptr.
Sorry for the possible confusion.
-----Original Message-----
From: Haifei Luo
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2021 9:29 AM
To: Slava Ovsiienko <viacheslavo at nvidia.com>; dev at dpdk.org
Cc: Ori Kam <orika at nvidia.com>; Raslan Darawsheh <rasland at nvidia.com>; Xueming(Steven) Li <xuemingl at nvidia.com>; Matan Azrad <matan at nvidia.com>; Shahaf Shuler <shahafs at nvidia.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 4/5] net/mlx5: add mlx5 APIs for single flow dump feature
Hi Slava,
For #1, The steering tool send messages to DPDK to request dump. Server/Client use data structure "struct msghdr"
to communicate. It has " msg_iov " ," msg_iovlen" and etc.
In the tool side, Msg_iov is constructed as 1 byte for port_id, 8 bytes for flowptr. In DPDK, then we parse the message this way.
For #2, I will move them to the beginning.
-----Original Message-----
From: Slava Ovsiienko <viacheslavo at nvidia.com>
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2021 3:38 PM
To: Haifei Luo <haifeil at nvidia.com>; dev at dpdk.org
Cc: Ori Kam <orika at nvidia.com>; Raslan Darawsheh <rasland at nvidia.com>; Xueming(Steven) Li <xuemingl at nvidia.com>; Haifei Luo <haifeil at nvidia.com>; Matan Azrad <matan at nvidia.com>; Shahaf Shuler <shahafs at nvidia.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 4/5] net/mlx5: add mlx5 APIs for single flow dump feature
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Haifei Luo <haifeil at nvidia.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 7, 2021 9:09
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Cc: Ori Kam <orika at nvidia.com>; Slava Ovsiienko
> <viacheslavo at nvidia.com>; Raslan Darawsheh <rasland at nvidia.com>;
> Xueming(Steven) Li <xuemingl at nvidia.com>; Haifei Luo
> <haifeil at nvidia.com>; Matan Azrad <matan at nvidia.com>; Shahaf Shuler
> <shahafs at nvidia.com>
> Subject: [PATCH v2 4/5] net/mlx5: add mlx5 APIs for single flow dump
> feature
>
> Modify API mlx5_flow_dev_dump to support the feature.
> Modify mlx5_socket since one extra arg flow_ptr is added.
>
> Signed-off-by: Haifei Luo <haifeil at nvidia.com>
Sorry, this patch is errorneously acked instead of the
"common/mlx5: add mlx5 APIs for single flow dump feature"
I have comment for this one.
> +#ifndef _GNU_SOURCE
> +#define _GNU_SOURCE
> +#endif
> +
> #include <sys/types.h>
> #include <sys/socket.h>
> #include <sys/un.h>
> @@ -29,11 +33,15 @@
> {
> int conn_sock;
> int ret;
> + int j;
> struct cmsghdr *cmsg = NULL;
> - int data;
> + #define LENGTH 9
> + /* The first byte for port_id and the rest for flowptr. */
> + int data[LENGTH];
So, we define 36/72 bytes array? And then use each int as byte to save flow_idx value?
I suppose the correct way would be to define the structure of message in stead of using ints array, something likle this:
struct mlx5_ipc_msg {
int status;
void* flow_idx;
}
> + /* The first byte in data for port_id and the following 8 for flowptr */
> + for (j = 1; j < LENGTH; j++)
> + flow_ptr = (flow_ptr << 8) + data[j];
If structure is define, there should be:
flow_ptr = msg->flow_idx
> + if (flow_ptr == 0)
> + ret = mlx5_flow_dev_dump(dev, NULL, file, NULL);
> + else
> + ret = mlx5_flow_dev_dump(dev,
> + (struct rte_flow *)((uintptr_t)flow_ptr), file, &err);
> +
> + /*dump one*/
> + uint32_t handle_idx;
> + int ret;
> + struct mlx5_flow_handle *dh;
> + struct rte_flow *flow = mlx5_ipool_get(priv->sh->ipool
> + [MLX5_IPOOL_RTE_FLOW], (uintptr_t)(void *)flow_idx);
> +
Please, move variable declarations to the routine beginning, to others
With best regards, Slava
More information about the dev
mailing list