[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 0/2] Fix coverity issues reported in DPDK-26381

[Zhang, Qi Z]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zhang, Qi Z
> Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2021 5:13 PM
> To: Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yigit at intel.com>; Huang, Wei
> <wei.huang at intel.com>; dev at dpdk.org; Xu, Rosen <rosen.xu at intel.com>
> Cc: stable at dpdk.org; Zhang, Tianfei <tianfei.zhang at intel.com>
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 0/2] Fix coverity issues reported in
> DPDK-26381
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yigit at intel.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2021 4:10 PM
> > To: Zhang, Qi Z <qi.z.zhang at intel.com>; Huang, Wei
> > <wei.huang at intel.com>; dev at dpdk.org; Xu, Rosen <rosen.xu at intel.com>
> > Cc: stable at dpdk.org; Zhang, Tianfei <tianfei.zhang at intel.com>
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 0/2] Fix coverity issues reported in
> > DPDK-26381
> >
> > On 4/1/2021 1:17 PM, Zhang, Qi Z wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Huang, Wei <wei.huang at intel.com>
> > >> Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2021 4:24 PM
> > >> To: dev at dpdk.org; Xu, Rosen <rosen.xu at intel.com>; Zhang, Qi Z
> > >> <qi.z.zhang at intel.com>
> > >> Cc: stable at dpdk.org; Zhang, Tianfei <tianfei.zhang at intel.com>;
> > >> Huang, Wei <wei.huang at intel.com>
> > >> Subject: [PATCH v1 0/2] Fix coverity issues reported in DPDK-26381
> > >>
> > >> Below coverity issues are fixed in this patch set.
> > >> 367480, 367482
> > >>
> > >> Wei Huang (2):
> > >>    raw/ifpga/base: use untained variable as argument
> > >>    raw/ifpga/base: add argument to use untained variable
> > >>
> > >>   drivers/raw/ifpga/base/ifpga_fme.c | 15 ++++++++-------
> > >>   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> 2.29.2
> > >
> > > Applied to dpdk-next-net-intel.
> > >
> >
> > Hi Qi,
> >
> > What is the status of this set?
> > It is not merged to your tree, and its patchwork status is 'Rejected'.
> 
> I think the status is wrong updated, and the patches are just dropped after
> re-sync with next-net, thanks for capture this.

OK, the patch set should be rejected, as they already be covered by below patch. 
http://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20210408085151.54996-2-wei.huang@intel.com/
So there is no miss operation in path work, just can't remember what happened :)

We are OK now.