[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10] ethdev: add sanity checks in control APIs

[Ferruh Yigit]

On 4/21/2021 5:22 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 4/21/2021 3:19 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
>> On 4/21/2021 1:36 PM, Min Hu (Connor) wrote:
>>> This patch adds more sanity checks in control path APIs.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 214ed1acd125 ("ethdev: add iterator to match devargs input")
>>> Fixes: 3d98f921fbe9 ("ethdev: unify prefix for static functions and variables")
>>> Fixes: 0366137722a0 ("ethdev: check for invalid device name")
>>> Fixes: d948f596fee2 ("ethdev: fix port data mismatched in multiple process 
>>> model")
>>> Fixes: 5b7ba31148a8 ("ethdev: add port ownership")
>>> Fixes: f8244c6399d9 ("ethdev: increase port id range")
>>> Cc: stable at dpdk.org
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Min Hu (Connor) <humin29 at huawei.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit at intel.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko at oktetlabs.ru>
>>> Acked-by: Kevin Traynor <ktraynor at redhat.com>
>>> Acked-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas at monjalon.net>
>>> Reviewed-by: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko at oktetlabs.ru>
>>
>> <...>
>>
>>> @@ -3256,6 +3371,13 @@ rte_eth_dev_fw_version_get(uint16_t port_id, char 
>>> *fw_version, size_t fw_size)
>>>       RTE_ETH_VALID_PORTID_OR_ERR_RET(port_id, -ENODEV);
>>>       dev = &rte_eth_devices[port_id];
>>> +    if (fw_version == NULL && fw_size > 0) {
>>> +        RTE_ETHDEV_LOG(ERR,
>>> +            "Cannot get ethdev port %u FW version to NULL\n",
>>
>> In the log problem seems like only 'fw_version' to be NULL but that is not 
>> exactly corret, what do you think to extend it as we did a few other places in 
>> this patch
>>
>> "Cannot get ethdev port %u FW version to NULL when string size is non zero\n"
>>
>> <...>
>>
>>> @@ -3323,6 +3451,14 @@ rte_eth_dev_get_supported_ptypes(uint16_t port_id, 
>>> uint32_t ptype_mask,
>>>       RTE_ETH_VALID_PORTID_OR_ERR_RET(port_id, -ENODEV);
>>>       dev = &rte_eth_devices[port_id];
>>> +
>>> +    if (ptypes == NULL && num > 0) {
>>> +        RTE_ETHDEV_LOG(ERR,
>>> +            "Cannot get ethdev port %u supported packet types to NULL\n",
>>> +            port_id);
>>
>> Ditto. What about:
>>
>> "Cannot get ethdev port %u supported packet types to NULL when array size is 
>> non zero\n
> 
> I can fix these in the next-net if there is no objection.

Applied to dpdk-next-net/main, thanks.

Above two logs updated while merging.