[PATCH v2] mempool: fix the description of some function return values
zhiheng chen
chenzhiheng0227 at gmail.com
Thu Dec 23 12:11:30 CET 2021
Thank you for pointing out my problem, I will fix it in the next version
> 2021年12月22日 下午7:45,Morten Brørup <mb at smartsharesystems.com> 写道:
>
>> From: Zhiheng Chen [mailto:chenzhiheng0227 at gmail.com <mailto:chenzhiheng0227 at gmail.com>]
>> Sent: Wednesday, 22 December 2021 09.26
>>
>> Compared to patch version 1, this version updates the descriptions
>> of underlying functions.
>
> Some comments inline below, regarding the return value of success.
>
> You should also update the description of the dequeue function prototype on line 451, so no one implements an alternative dequeue operation that returns anything else than -ENOBUFS as error value.
>
> @Olivier, @Andrew: Do we want to impose this restriction on the API?
>
> Otherwise, the patch should take the opposite direction, and update the descriptions of high level functions - i.e. rte_mempool_generic_get(), rte_mempool_get_bulk(), rte_mempool_get(), etc. - to reflect that any error value <0 can be returned, originating from the underlying function.
>
>>
>> In rte_mempool_ring.c, the committer uses the symbol ENOBUFS to
>> describe the return value of function common_ring_sc_dequeue,
>> but in rte_mempool.h, the symbol ENOENT is used to describe
>> the return value of function rte_mempool_get. If the user of
>> dpdk uses the symbol ENOENT as the judgment condition of
>> the return value, it may cause some abnormal phenomena
>> in their own programs, such as when the mempool space is exhausted.
>>
>> Fixes: ea5dd2744b90 ("mempool: cache optimisations")
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhiheng Chen <chenzhiheng0227 at gmail.com>
>> ---
>> lib/mempool/rte_mempool.h | 22 +++++++++++-----------
>> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/lib/mempool/rte_mempool.h b/lib/mempool/rte_mempool.h
>> index 1e7a3c1527..3b52bd6737 100644
>> --- a/lib/mempool/rte_mempool.h
>> +++ b/lib/mempool/rte_mempool.h
>> @@ -737,8 +737,8 @@ rte_mempool_ops_alloc(struct rte_mempool *mp);
>> * @param n
>> * Number of objects to get.
>> * @return
>> - * - 0: Success; got n objects.
>> - * - <0: Error; code of dequeue function.
>> + * - >=0: Success; number of objects supplied.
>> + * - -ENOBUFS: Not enough entries in the mempool; no object is
>> retrieved.
>
> NAK regarding success: Return value 0 is correct, >=0 cannot happen.
>
>> */
>> static inline int
>> rte_mempool_ops_dequeue_bulk(struct rte_mempool *mp,
>> @@ -1453,7 +1453,7 @@ rte_mempool_put(struct rte_mempool *mp, void
>> *obj)
>> * A pointer to a mempool cache structure. May be NULL if not
>> needed.
>> * @return
>> * - >=0: Success; number of objects supplied.
>
> This is also wrong. It should be:
> -* - >=0: Success; number of objects supplied.
> +* - 0: Success; got n objects.
>
>> - * - <0: Error; code of ring dequeue function.
>> + * - -ENOBUFS: Not enough entries in the mempool; no object is
>> retrieved.
>> */
>> static __rte_always_inline int
>> rte_mempool_do_generic_get(struct rte_mempool *mp, void **obj_table,
>> @@ -1521,7 +1521,7 @@ rte_mempool_do_generic_get(struct rte_mempool
>> *mp, void **obj_table,
>> * Get several objects from the mempool.
>> *
>> * If cache is enabled, objects will be retrieved first from cache,
>> - * subsequently from the common pool. Note that it can return -ENOENT
>> when
>> + * subsequently from the common pool. Note that it can return -ENOBUFS
>> when
>> * the local cache and common pool are empty, even if cache from other
>> * lcores are full.
>> *
>> @@ -1534,8 +1534,8 @@ rte_mempool_do_generic_get(struct rte_mempool
>> *mp, void **obj_table,
>> * @param cache
>> * A pointer to a mempool cache structure. May be NULL if not
>> needed.
>> * @return
>> - * - 0: Success; objects taken.
>> - * - -ENOENT: Not enough entries in the mempool; no object is
>> retrieved.
>> + * - >=0: Success; number of objects supplied.
>> + * - -ENOBUFS: Not enough entries in the mempool; no object is
>> retrieved.
>
> NAK regarding success: Return value 0 is correct, >=0 cannot happen.
>
>> */
>> static __rte_always_inline int
>> rte_mempool_generic_get(struct rte_mempool *mp, void **obj_table,
>> @@ -1557,7 +1557,7 @@ rte_mempool_generic_get(struct rte_mempool *mp,
>> void **obj_table,
>> * mempool creation time (see flags).
>> *
>> * If cache is enabled, objects will be retrieved first from cache,
>> - * subsequently from the common pool. Note that it can return -ENOENT
>> when
>> + * subsequently from the common pool. Note that it can return -ENOBUFS
>> when
>> * the local cache and common pool are empty, even if cache from other
>> * lcores are full.
>> *
>> @@ -1568,8 +1568,8 @@ rte_mempool_generic_get(struct rte_mempool *mp,
>> void **obj_table,
>> * @param n
>> * The number of objects to get from the mempool to obj_table.
>> * @return
>> - * - 0: Success; objects taken
>> - * - -ENOENT: Not enough entries in the mempool; no object is
>> retrieved.
>> + * - >=0: Success; number of objects supplied.
>> + * - -ENOBUFS: Not enough entries in the mempool; no object is
>> retrieved.
>
> NAK regarding success: Return value 0 is correct, >=0 cannot happen.
>
>> */
>> static __rte_always_inline int
>> rte_mempool_get_bulk(struct rte_mempool *mp, void **obj_table,
>> unsigned int n)
>> @@ -1588,7 +1588,7 @@ rte_mempool_get_bulk(struct rte_mempool *mp, void
>> **obj_table, unsigned int n)
>> * mempool creation (see flags).
>> *
>> * If cache is enabled, objects will be retrieved first from cache,
>> - * subsequently from the common pool. Note that it can return -ENOENT
>> when
>> + * subsequently from the common pool. Note that it can return -ENOBUFS
>> when
>> * the local cache and common pool are empty, even if cache from other
>> * lcores are full.
>> *
>> @@ -1598,7 +1598,7 @@ rte_mempool_get_bulk(struct rte_mempool *mp, void
>> **obj_table, unsigned int n)
>> * A pointer to a void * pointer (object) that will be filled.
>> * @return
>> * - 0: Success; objects taken.
>> - * - -ENOENT: Not enough entries in the mempool; no object is
>> retrieved.
>> + * - -ENOBUFS: Not enough entries in the mempool; no object is
>> retrieved.
>> */
>> static __rte_always_inline int
>> rte_mempool_get(struct rte_mempool *mp, void **obj_p)
>> --
>> 2.32.0
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/attachments/20211223/a19aa1e7/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the dev
mailing list