[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] net/i40e: fix flex payload rule conflict issue

[Zhang, Qi Z]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev <dev-bounces at dpdk.org> On Behalf Of Guo, Jia
> Sent: Tuesday, January 5, 2021 11:40 AM
> To: Xing, Beilei <beilei.xing at intel.com>; dev at dpdk.org
> Cc: stable at dpdk.org; Sun, Chenmin <chenmin.sun at intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] net/i40e: fix flex payload rule conflict issue
> 
> Acked-by: Jeff Guo <jia.guo at intel.com>
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Xing, Beilei <beilei.xing at intel.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 5, 2021 11:13 AM
> > To: Guo, Jia <jia.guo at intel.com>; dev at dpdk.org
> > Cc: Xing, Beilei <beilei.xing at intel.com>; stable at dpdk.org; Sun,
> > Chenmin <chenmin.sun at intel.com>
> > Subject: [PATCH v5] net/i40e: fix flex payload rule conflict issue
> >
> > From: Beilei Xing <beilei.xing at intel.com>
> >
> > With the following commands, the second flow can't be created successfully.
> >
> > 1. flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 / udp /
> >    raw relative is 1 pattern is 0102030405 / end
> >    actions drop / end
> > 2. flow destroy 0 rule 0
> > 3. flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 / udp /
> >    raw relative is 1 pattern is 010203040506 / end
> >    actions drop / end
> >
> > The root cause is that a flag for flex pit isn't reset.
> >
> > Fixes: 6ced3dd72f5f ("net/i40e: support flexible payload parsing for
> > FDIR")
> > Cc: stable at dpdk.org
> >
> > Reported-by: Chenmin Sun<chenmin.sun at intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Beilei Xing <beilei.xing at intel.com>

Applied to dpdk-next-net-intel.

Thanks
Qi