[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/9] vfio_user: implement device and region related APIs

Xia, Chenbo chenbo.xia at intel.com
Wed Jan 6 08:50:38 CET 2021


Hi Beilei,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Xing, Beilei <beilei.xing at intel.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 6, 2021 1:52 PM
> To: Xia, Chenbo <chenbo.xia at intel.com>; dev at dpdk.org; thomas at monjalon.net;
> david.marchand at redhat.com
> Cc: stephen at networkplumber.org; Liang, Cunming <cunming.liang at intel.com>; Lu,
> Xiuchun <xiuchun.lu at intel.com>; Li, Miao <miao.li at intel.com>; Wu, Jingjing
> <jingjing.wu at intel.com>
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/9] vfio_user: implement device and region
> related APIs
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: dev <dev-bounces at dpdk.org> On Behalf Of Chenbo Xia
> > Sent: Friday, December 18, 2020 3:39 PM
> > To: dev at dpdk.org; thomas at monjalon.net; david.marchand at redhat.com
> > Cc: stephen at networkplumber.org; Liang, Cunming
> > <cunming.liang at intel.com>; Lu, Xiuchun <xiuchun.lu at intel.com>; Li, Miao
> > <miao.li at intel.com>; Wu, Jingjing <jingjing.wu at intel.com>
> > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/9] vfio_user: implement device and region
> > related APIs
> >
> > This patch introduces device and region related APIs, which are
> > rte_vfio_user_set_dev_info() and rte_vfio_user_set_reg_info().
> > The corresponding vfio-user command handling is also added with the
> > definition of all vfio-user command identity.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chenbo Xia <chenbo.xia at intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Xiuchun Lu <xiuchun.lu at intel.com>
> > ---
> >  lib/librte_vfio_user/rte_vfio_user.h    |  60 ++++++
> >  lib/librte_vfio_user/version.map        |   2 +
> >  lib/librte_vfio_user/vfio_user_base.c   |  12 ++
> >  lib/librte_vfio_user/vfio_user_base.h   |  32 +++-
> >  lib/librte_vfio_user/vfio_user_server.c | 232 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  lib/librte_vfio_user/vfio_user_server.h |   2 +
> >  6 files changed, 339 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/librte_vfio_user/rte_vfio_user.h
> > b/lib/librte_vfio_user/rte_vfio_user.h
> > index 0d4f6c1be2..8a999c7aa0 100644
> > --- a/lib/librte_vfio_user/rte_vfio_user.h
> > +++ b/lib/librte_vfio_user/rte_vfio_user.h
> > @@ -5,13 +5,35 @@
> >  #ifndef _RTE_VFIO_USER_H
> >  #define _RTE_VFIO_USER_H
> >
> 
> <snip>
> 
> > +static int vfio_user_device_get_reg_info(struct vfio_user_server *dev,
> > +	VFIO_USER_MSG *msg)
> > +{
> > +	struct vfio_user_reg *reg = &msg->payload.reg_info;
> > +	struct rte_vfio_user_reg_info *reg_info;
> > +	struct vfio_region_info *vinfo;
> > +
> > +	if (vfio_user_check_msg_fdnum(msg, 0) != 0)
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +	if (msg->size > sizeof(*reg) + VFIO_USER_MSG_HDR_SIZE ||
> > +		dev->reg->reg_num <= reg->reg_info.index) {
> > +		VFIO_USER_LOG(ERR, "Invalid message for get dev info\n");
> 
> Invalid message for get region info?

Yes.. Will fix it in v2.

> 
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	reg_info = &dev->reg->reg_info[reg->reg_info.index];
> > +	vinfo = reg_info->info;
> > +	memcpy(reg, vinfo, vinfo->argsz);
> > +
> > +	if (reg_info->fd != -1) {
> > +		msg->fd_num = 1;
> > +		msg->fds[0] = reg_info->fd;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	VFIO_USER_LOG(DEBUG, "Region(%u) info: addr(0x%" PRIx64 "),
> > fd(%d), "
> > +		"sz(0x%llx), argsz(0x%x), c_off(0x%x), flags(0x%x) "
> > +		"off(0x%llx)\n", vinfo->index, (uint64_t)reg_info->base,
> > +		reg_info->fd, vinfo->size, vinfo->argsz, vinfo->cap_offset,
> > +		vinfo->flags, vinfo->offset);
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> 
> <snip>
> 
> > +int rte_vfio_user_set_dev_info(const char *sock_addr,
> > +	struct vfio_device_info *dev_info)
> > +{
> > +	struct vfio_user_server *dev;
> > +	struct vfio_user_server_socket *sk;
> > +	int dev_id;
> > +
> > +	if (!dev_info)
> > +		return -1;
> > +
> > +	pthread_mutex_lock(&vfio_ep_sock.mutex);
> > +	sk = find_vfio_user_socket(sock_addr);
> > +	pthread_mutex_unlock(&vfio_ep_sock.mutex);
> > +
> > +	if (!sk) {
> > +		VFIO_USER_LOG(ERR, "Failed to set device info with
> > sock_addr "
> > +			"%s: addr not registered.\n", sock_addr);
> > +		return -1;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	dev_id = sk->sock.dev_id;
> > +	dev = vfio_user_get_device(dev_id);
> > +	if (!dev) {
> > +		VFIO_USER_LOG(ERR, "Failed to set device info:"
> > +			"device %d not found.\n", dev_id);
> > +		return -1;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	if (dev->started) {
> > +		VFIO_USER_LOG(ERR, "Failed to set device info for
> > device %d\n"
> > +			 ", device already started\n", dev_id);
> > +		return -1;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	dev->dev_info = dev_info;
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +int rte_vfio_user_set_reg_info(const char *sock_addr,
> > +	struct rte_vfio_user_regions *reg)
> > +{
> > +	struct vfio_user_server *dev;
> > +	struct vfio_user_server_socket *sk;
> > +	int dev_id;
> > +
> > +	if (!reg)
> > +		return -1;
> > +
> > +	pthread_mutex_lock(&vfio_ep_sock.mutex);
> > +	sk = find_vfio_user_socket(sock_addr);
> > +	pthread_mutex_unlock(&vfio_ep_sock.mutex);
> > +
> > +	if (!sk) {
> > +		VFIO_USER_LOG(ERR, "Failed to set region info with
> > sock_addr:"
> > +			"%s: addr not registered.\n", sock_addr);
> > +		return -1;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	dev_id = sk->sock.dev_id;
> > +	dev = vfio_user_get_device(dev_id);
> > +	if (!dev) {
> > +		VFIO_USER_LOG(ERR, "Failed to set region info:"
> > +			"device %d not found.\n", dev_id);
> > +		return -1;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	if (dev->started) {
> > +		VFIO_USER_LOG(ERR, "Failed to set region info for
> > device %d\n"
> > +			 ", device already started\n", dev_id);
> > +		return -1;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	dev->reg = reg;
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> 
> Do you think if we can define a static function to cover the duplicated check
> part of function rte_vfio_user_set_dev_info and rte_vfio_user_set_reg_info?

Good catch! Yes, there's some duplicated code in some set APIs. I will refactor them
in v2.

Thanks!
Chenbo

> 
> > diff --git a/lib/librte_vfio_user/vfio_user_server.h
> > b/lib/librte_vfio_user/vfio_user_server.h
> > index 00e3f6353d..e8fb61cb3e 100644
> > --- a/lib/librte_vfio_user/vfio_user_server.h
> > +++ b/lib/librte_vfio_user/vfio_user_server.h
> > @@ -16,6 +16,8 @@ struct vfio_user_server {
> >  	uint32_t msg_id;
> >  	char sock_addr[PATH_MAX];
> >  	struct vfio_user_version ver;
> > +	struct vfio_device_info *dev_info;
> > +	struct rte_vfio_user_regions *reg;
> >  };
> >
> >  typedef int (*event_handler)(int fd, void *data);
> > --
> > 2.17.1



More information about the dev mailing list