[dpdk-dev] [dpdk-dev v2 1/2] ethdev: add new tunnel type for ecpri

[Thomas Monjalon]

07/01/2021 10:32, Guo, Jia:
> From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas at monjalon.net>
> > 24/12/2020 07:59, Jeff Guo:
> > > Add type of RTE_TUNNEL_TYPE_ECPRI into the enum of ethdev tunnel
> > type.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jeff Guo <jia.guo at intel.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Qi Zhang <qi.z.zhang at intel.com>
> > [...]
> > > --- a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.h
> > > +++ b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.h
> > > @@ -1219,6 +1219,7 @@ enum rte_eth_tunnel_type {
> > >  	RTE_TUNNEL_TYPE_IP_IN_GRE,
> > >  	RTE_L2_TUNNEL_TYPE_E_TAG,
> > >  	RTE_TUNNEL_TYPE_VXLAN_GPE,
> > > +	RTE_TUNNEL_TYPE_ECPRI,
> > >  	RTE_TUNNEL_TYPE_MAX,
> > >  };
> > 
> > We tried to remove all these legacy API in DPDK 20.11.
> > Andrew decided to not remove this one because it is not yet completely
> > replaced by rte_flow in all drivers.
> > However, I am against continuing to update this API.
> > The opposite work should be done: migrate to rte_flow.
> 
> Agree but seems that the legacy api and driver legacy implementation
> still keep in this release, and there is no a general way to replace
> the legacy by rte_flow right now.

I think rte_flow is a complete replacement with more features.
You can match, encap, decap.
There is even a new API to get tunnel infos after decap.
What is missing?


> > Sorry, it is a nack.
> > BTW, it is probably breaking the ABI because of RTE_TUNNEL_TYPE_MAX.
> 
> Oh, the ABI break should be a problem.
> 
> > PS: please Cc ethdev maintainers for such patch, thanks.
> > tip: use --cc-cmd devtools/get-maintainer.sh
> 
> Thanks for your helpful tip.