[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v17 03/11] eal: change API of power intrinsics
Burakov, Anatoly
anatoly.burakov at intel.com
Wed Jan 20 11:32:21 CET 2021
On 19-Jan-21 2:17 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 19/01/2021 12:23, Burakov, Anatoly:
>> On 19-Jan-21 10:42 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>>> 19/01/2021 11:29, Burakov, Anatoly:
>>>> On 18-Jan-21 10:26 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>>>>> 14/01/2021 15:46, Anatoly Burakov:
>>>>>> +struct rte_power_monitor_cond {
>>>>>> + volatile void *addr; /**< Address to monitor for changes */
>>>>>> + uint64_t val; /**< Before attempting the monitoring, the address
>>>>>> + * may be read and compared against this value.
>>>>>
>>>>> "may" be read and compared?
>>>>> Is there a case where there is no read and compare?
>>>>
>>>> Yes, if the mask is not set.
>>>
>>> If the mask is not set, the address is "read" anyway
>>> or it is only "watched" for any change?
>>>
>>> Sorry the mechanism is really not clear to me.
>>>
>>
>> The "value" is only used to avoid the sleep, i.e. to check if the write
>> has already happened. We're waiting on *a write* rather than *a value*,
>> so it's not equivalent to "wait until equal" call. It's more of a "sleep
>> until something happens".
>
> Please make things explicit in doxygen.
> The behaviour of each case should be explained crystal clear.
> Thanks
>
>
It is explained in the comments to `rte_power_monitor()` call. But OK,
i'll add more clarification for the struct too.
--
Thanks,
Anatoly
More information about the dev
mailing list