[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 1/2] cryptodev: support enqueue and dequeue callback functions
Thomas Monjalon
thomas at monjalon.net
Wed Jan 20 14:15:34 CET 2021
20/01/2021 14:01, Kinsella, Ray:
> From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas at monjalon.net>
> > 15/01/2021 17:01, Akhil Goyal:
> > > > This patch adds APIs to add/remove callback functions on crypto
> > > > enqueue/dequeue burst. The callback function will be called for
> > each
> > > > burst of crypto ops received/sent on a given crypto device queue
> > > > pair.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Abhinandan Gujjar <abhinandan.gujjar at intel.com>
> > > > Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev at intel.com>
> > > > ---
> > > Series applied to dpdk-next-crypto
> >
> >
> > It is missing a rule to ignore the false positive ABI break:
> >
> > --- a/devtools/libabigail.abignore
> > +++ b/devtools/libabigail.abignore
> > @@ -11,3 +11,8 @@
> > ; Explicit ignore for driver-only ABI
> > [suppress_type]
> > name = eth_dev_ops
> > +
> > +; Ignore fields inserted in cacheline boundary of rte_cryptodev
> > +[suppress_type]
> > + name = rte_cryptodev
> > + has_data_member_inserted_between = {0, 1023}
> >
>
> This is a bit of a blunt instrument as the range quiet large?
The range is in bits. It matches the actual size of the struct
for 64B cacheline.
> {offset_after(attached), end} instead works better - I will send a patch.
Yes that's exactly what David told me earlier today.
> > I'll add this change while pulling in the main tree.
Yes please.
Note: we missed requiring this exception rule in the original patch.
More information about the dev
mailing list