[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 05/11] net/octeontx_ep: Add dev info get and configure

Ferruh Yigit ferruh.yigit at intel.com
Tue Jan 26 16:31:09 CET 2021


On 1/18/2021 9:35 AM, Nalla Pradeep wrote:
> Add device information get and device configure operations.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nalla Pradeep <pnalla at marvell.com>

<...>

> +static int
> +otx_ep_dev_info_get(struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev,
> +		    struct rte_eth_dev_info *devinfo)
> +{
> +	struct otx_ep_device *otx_epvf;
> +	struct rte_pci_device *pdev;
> +	uint32_t dev_id;
> +
> +	otx_epvf = OTX_EP_DEV(eth_dev);
> +	pdev = otx_epvf->pdev;
> +	dev_id = pdev->id.device_id;
> +
> +	devinfo->speed_capa = ETH_LINK_SPEED_10G;

Is it always 10G independent from the device type and PHY?

Also can you please update the featutes file, octeontx_ep.ini, as the same patch 
features are added.
For example the 'Speed capabilities' feature can be set as P (partially 
supported) with this patch.

> +	devinfo->max_rx_queues = otx_epvf->max_rx_queues;
> +	devinfo->max_tx_queues = otx_epvf->max_tx_queues;
> +
> +	devinfo->min_rx_bufsize = OTX_EP_MIN_RX_BUF_SIZE;
> +	if (dev_id == PCI_DEVID_OCTEONTX_EP_VF ||
> +	    dev_id == PCI_DEVID_OCTEONTX2_EP_NET_VF ||
> +	    dev_id == PCI_DEVID_CN98XX_EP_NET_VF) {
> +		devinfo->max_rx_pktlen = OTX_EP_MAX_PKT_SZ;
> +		devinfo->rx_offload_capa = DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_JUMBO_FRAME;
> +		devinfo->rx_offload_capa |= DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_SCATTER;
> +		devinfo->tx_offload_capa = DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_MULTI_SEGS;
> +	}


The above list seems all the devices this driver probes, is there a reason to 
check for them?

<...>

> +static int
> +otx_ep_dev_configure(struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev)
> +{
> +	struct otx_ep_device *otx_epvf = OTX_EP_DEV(eth_dev);
> +	struct rte_eth_dev_data *data = eth_dev->data;
> +	struct rte_eth_rxmode *rxmode;
> +	struct rte_eth_txmode *txmode;
> +	struct rte_eth_conf *conf;
> +	uint32_t ethdev_queues;
> +
> +	conf = &data->dev_conf;
> +	rxmode = &conf->rxmode;
> +	txmode = &conf->txmode;
> +	ethdev_queues = (uint32_t)(otx_epvf->sriov_info.rings_per_vf);
> +	if (eth_dev->data->nb_rx_queues > ethdev_queues ||
> +	    eth_dev->data->nb_tx_queues > ethdev_queues) {

In dev_info, 'max_rx_queues' & 'max_tx_queues' set by 'otx_epvf->max_rx_queues' 
& 'otx_epvf->max_tx_queues' respectively, but here they are checked against
'otx_epvf->sriov_info.rings_per_vf' are they same values? Or should dev_info 
chaged to set correct limits?


More information about the dev mailing list