[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 00/13] net/ionic: fixes and optimizations

[Ferruh Yigit]

On 1/27/2021 6:10 PM, Andrew Boyer wrote:
> 
> 
>> On Jan 27, 2021, at 1:02 PM, Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit at intel.com 
>> <mailto:ferruh.yigit at intel.com>> wrote:
>>
>> On 1/18/2021 8:34 PM, Andrew Boyer wrote:
>>> This patch series fixes some transmit issues, adds (better) support for
>>> big-endian systems, and improves performance by stripping down some
>>> structures and inlining a few functions.
>>> The endianness code has been reviewed internally but not really tested -
>>> I do not have access to a big-endian system to test on.
>>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Boyer <aboyer at pensando.io <mailto:aboyer at pensando.io>>
>>> Andrew Boyer (13):
>>>   net/ionic: strip out unneeded interrupt code
>>>   net/ionic: observe endianness in firmware commands
>>>   net/ionic: observe endianness in Rx filter code
>>>   net/ionic: add an array-size macro
>>>   net/ionic: query firmware for supported queue versions
>>>   net/ionic: clean up Tx queue version support
>>>   net/ionic: inline queue flush function
>>>   net/ionic: inline queue space function
>>>   net/ionic: observe endiannness in ioread/iowrite
>>>   net/ionic: fix to allow separate L3 and L4 csum offload
>>>   net/ionic: convert per-queue offloads into queue flags
>>>   net/ionic: fix up function attribute tags
>>>   net/ionic: fix address handling in transmit code
>>
>> I can remove the 4/13 & 6/13 without conflict, and seems there is no 
>> dependency to them and new version of them can be sent separately, if you 
>> confirm I can proceed with rest of the set now.
> 
> Yes please. Do 4 & 6 become v1 patches that stand alone? Or v2 patches that 
> reply to their v1 versions?
> 

Except 4/13 & 6/13,
Series applied to dpdk-next-net/main, thanks.

Can you please send missing two patches as v2 as reply to v1?

Thanks,
ferruh