[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6] ethdev: add new ext hdr for gtp psc

Raslan Darawsheh rasland at nvidia.com
Thu Jul 8 11:27:31 CEST 2021


Thank you for the review,

Basically it's not used yet since it will break the abi
The main usage was in rte_flow item of gtp_psc
To replace the current structure with the header definition. And since this will break the abi I'm adding the header definition now but will be used later in rte_flow.

Kindest regards,
Raslan Darawsheh

________________________________
From: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko at oktetlabs.ru>
Sent: Thursday, July 8, 2021, 12:23 PM
To: Raslan Darawsheh; Singh, Aman Deep; dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6] ethdev: add new ext hdr for gtp psc

Hi Raslan,

On 7/6/21 5:24 PM, Raslan Darawsheh wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> Sorry for missing this mail, for some reason it was missed in my inbox,
> This is the link to this rfc:
> https://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Specs/archive/38_series/38.415/38415-g30.zip

Thanks for the link. The patch LGTM, but I have only one question left.
Where is it used? Are you going to upstream corresponding code in
the release cycle?

Andrew.

> Kindest regards,
> Raslan Darawsheh
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: dev <dev-bounces at dpdk.org> On Behalf Of Andrew Rybchenko
>> Sent: Thursday, July 1, 2021 5:06 PM
>> To: Singh, Aman Deep <aman.deep.singh at intel.com>; dev at dpdk.org
>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6] ethdev: add new ext hdr for gtp psc
>>
>> Hi Raslan,
>>
>> could you reply, please.
>>
>> Andrew.
>>
>> On 6/22/21 10:27 AM, Singh, Aman Deep wrote:
>>> Hi Raslan,
>>>
>>> Can you please provide link to this RFC 38415-g30 I just had some
>>> doubt on byte-order conversion as per RFC 1700
>>> <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1700>
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Aman




More information about the dev mailing list