[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 4/6] net/ark: cleanup ark dynamic extension interface

Ferruh Yigit ferruh.yigit at intel.com
Tue Mar 9 18:50:23 CET 2021


On 3/9/2021 4:08 PM, Ed Czeck wrote:
> - Rename extension functions with rte_pmd_ark prefix
> - Move extension prototype to rte_pmd_ark.h
> - Update local function documentation
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ed Czeck <ed.czeck at atomicrules.com>
> ---
> v3:
> - split function rename from previous commit
> v4:
> - reorder patches renaming before adding

<...>

> diff --git a/drivers/net/ark/rte_pmd_ark.h b/drivers/net/ark/rte_pmd_ark.h
> index 6f26d66b1..0f24a347d 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ark/rte_pmd_ark.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ark/rte_pmd_ark.h
> @@ -1,18 +1,24 @@
>   /* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
> - * Copyright (c) 2020 Atomic Rules LLC
> + * Copyright (c) 2020-2021 Atomic Rules LLC
>    */
>   
>   #ifndef RTE_PMD_ARK_H
>   #define RTE_PMD_ARK_H
>   
> +#include <rte_mbuf.h>
> +#include <rte_mbuf_dyn.h>
> +
> +#include <stdint.h>
> +struct rte_eth_dev;
> +struct rte_mbuf;
> +struct rte_ether_addr;
> +struct rte_eth_stats;
> +

Is the declaring structures instead of including header preferred intentionally?

I guess both works, and it may not differ for the PMD at all, but for the 
extension developer that is including this header, it may need to include 
required headers again, this header including all required headers and be a self 
contained may help extension code, up to you.

Plus just a detail but I guess mbuf struct is redundant for this patch, it can 
be added in next patch where mbufs header removed and hooks added.


More information about the dev mailing list