[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/8] ether: refine debug compile option

Ferruh Yigit ferruh.yigit at intel.com
Tue Mar 16 17:37:14 CET 2021


On 3/16/2021 1:39 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 16/03/2021 14:05, Ferruh Yigit:
>> On 3/12/2021 12:12 PM, Qi Zhang wrote:
>>> PMDs use RTE_LIBRTE_<PMD_NAME>_DEBUG_RX|TX as compile option to wrap
>>> data path debug code. As .config has been removed since the meson build,
>>> It is not friendly for new DPDK users to notice those debug options.
>>>
>>> The patch introduces below compile options for specific Rx/Tx data path
>>> debug, so PMD can choose to reuse them to avoid maintain their own.
>>>
>>> - RTE_LIBRTE_ETHDEV_DEBUG_RX
>>> - RTE_LIBRTE_ETHDEV_DEBUG_TX
>>>
>>> Also, all the compile options are documented on the overview page, so
>>> users can easily find them.

<...>

>>> +
>>> +- ``RTE_LIBRTE_ETHDEV_DEBUG`` (default **disabled**)
>>> +
>>> +  Compile with debug code on data path.
> 
> What is data path if not Rx or Tx?
> 
>>> +
>>> +- ``RTE_LIBRTE_ETHDEV_DEBUG_RX`` (default **disabled**)
>>> +
>>> +  Compile with debug code on Rx data path.
>>> +
>>> +- ``RTE_LIBRTE_ETHDEV_DEBUG_TX`` (default **disabled**)
>>> +
>>> +  Compile with debug code on Tx data path.
> 
> In general, I think "LIBRTE_" is redundant and useless as macro prefix.
> 


'RTE_LIBRTE_ETHDEV_DEBUG' already exits, it enables datapath debug without 
distinguishing Rx or Tx.

When we have _RX and _TX macro variants now, it may be possible to
1- get rid of 'RTE_LIBRTE_ETHDEV_DEBUG' macro and continue with fine grained RX & TX
2- Use 'RTE_LIBRTE_ETHDEV_DEBUG' as an alias to enable both RX & TX
3- Keep 'RTE_LIBRTE_ETHDEV_DEBUG' for ethdev layer datapath debug, and RX & TX 
variants for PMDs.

I think (3) can be more backward compatible, and can be helpful to separate 
ethdev layer and PMD debugging, but no so strong opinion.


More information about the dev mailing list