[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] test: make hugepage check more robust under Linux
Aaron Conole
aconole at redhat.com
Fri Mar 19 15:34:02 CET 2021
David Marchand <david.marchand at redhat.com> writes:
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 3:44 PM Aaron Conole <aconole at redhat.com> wrote:
>> diff --git a/app/test/has-hugepage.sh b/app/test/has-hugepage.sh
>> index d600fad319..1c3cfb665a 100755
>> --- a/app/test/has-hugepage.sh
>> +++ b/app/test/has-hugepage.sh
>> @@ -3,7 +3,17 @@
>> # Copyright 2020 Mellanox Technologies, Ltd
>>
>> if [ "$(uname)" = "Linux" ] ; then
>> - cat /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages || echo 0
>> + nr_hugepages=$(cat /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages)
>> + # Need to check if we have permissions to access hugepages
>> + perm=""
>> + for mount in `mount | grep hugetlbfs | awk '{ print $3; }'`; do
>> + test ! -w $mount/. || perm="$mount"
>> + done
>> + if [ "$perm" = "" -o "$nr_hugepages" = "0" ]; then
>> + echo 0
>> + else
>> + echo $nr_hugepages
>> + fi
>> elif [ "$(uname)" = "FreeBSD" ] ; then
>> echo 1 # assume FreeBSD always has hugepages
>> else
>
> The check is evaluated first when configuring as normal user and not
> reevaluated when running the tests as root in Travis/GHA, so the tests
> are started with no hugepage.
>
> Then, in Travis and GHA, we can see (sigbus o_O) crashes in no-huge mode.
> I tried to reproduce but did not manage.
I noticed that as well. I am equally as confused, but I'm working on
it (along with folding in Thomas' suggestions).
More information about the dev
mailing list