[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] config/arm: fix Hisilicon kunpeng920 SoC build

[Min Hu (Connor)]

Hi, all,
	any comments for this patch?
	Hope for your reply.
	Thanks.


在 2021/3/5 9:36, oulijun 写道:
> 
> 
> 在 2021/3/1 18:46, Juraj Linkeš 写道:
>>
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas at monjalon.net>
>>> Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2021 1:10 PM
>>> To: Juraj Linkeš <juraj.linkes at pantheon.tech>
>>> Cc: oulijun <oulijun at huawei.com>; ferruh.yigit at intel.com; dev at dpdk.org;
>>> linuxarm at openeuler.org
>>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] config/arm: fix Hisilicon 
>>> kunpeng920 SoC
>>> build
>>>
>>> 24/02/2021 12:55, Juraj Linkeš:
>>>> From: dev <dev-bounces at dpdk.org> On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon
>>>>> 24/02/2021 02:34, oulijun:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 在 2021/2/10 17:41, Thomas Monjalon 写道:
>>>>>>> 03/02/2021 13:46, Lijun Ou:
>>>>>>>> From: Chengchang Tang <tangchengchang at huawei.com>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Because of the '9ca2f16' have merged, the current hns3 pmd
>>>>>>>> driver can not be directly complied on the kunpeng920 server board.
>>>>>>>> Therefore, we need to fix the meson build.
>>>>>>>> Besides, add kunpeng 920 SoC meson cross compile target.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Fixes: 9ca2f16faa7f ("config/arm: isolate generic build")
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Why do you think this patch is fixing the one above?
>>>>>>> It looks just a new config, not a fix. Am I missing something?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm sorry to see you so late. In the meantime, we are celebrating
>>>>>> the Spring Festival. This patch fixes the problem. If the patch is
>>>>>> not added, the latest version cannot be directly compiled on the
>>>>>> Kunpeng
>>>>>> 930 server board.In addition, the cross compilation configuration 
>>>>>> file is
>>> added.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please can you explain what was removed which breaks your compilation?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I can explain what's changed and why we changed it.
>>>>
>>>> The previous behavior was that when an uknown implementer was found
>>> (when we're building on an uknown build machine) we fell back to a 
>>> generic
>>> build.
>>>> The current behavior is we raise an error when building on an 
>>>> unknown build
>>> machine and inform the user about the generic build (there's an error 
>>> in the
>>> message, it should be -Dmachine=default instead of 
>>> -Dmachine=generic). Lijun
>>> came across this scenario, so he wants to add an implementer, but it 
>>> is not a fix,
>>> rather an addition that we wanted to encourage when we changed the
>>> behavior. The change in behavior also has an additional benefit in 
>>> that it notifies
>>> the user that meson is not doing a tailored build for the build 
>>> machine and the
>>> only permissible build is the generic one.
>>>
>>> There were already many fixes for that rework.
>>> Please check if there are other missing updates.
>>>
>>
>> This is actually the first mistake that my testing missed. I tested 
>> that the message is properly emitted, but I didn't test the message 
>> after we extracted the default->generic rename patch. As a side note, 
>> we could address this issue with 
>> http://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/1613657555-17683-1-git-send-email-juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech/ 
>> - then we can leave the message in place as is (with -Dmachine=generic).
>>
>> I went through all of the patches again but I didn't find anything 
>> that needs addressing.
>>
>> As far as I'm aware, there were two other fixes for the series. One 
>> was a failure of communication (the native margs fix - I implemented 
>> what we thought we agreed on) and the other is not really a fix, just 
>> the addition of one implementer configuration (I removed the 
>> implementer because we didn't have its configuration). The clang 
>> cross-compile fixes are related, but those are the problem with that 
>> series, not the rework series.
>>
> Hi,
>    the patch 
> http://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/1613657555-17683-1-git-send-email-juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech/ 
> 
> will this patch be incorporated? We have realized this problem and fixed 
> it in the internal version.
>>>
>>>
>>
> .