[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] test/crypto: close PMD after tests
Akhil Goyal
gakhil at marvell.com
Tue Mar 23 20:27:01 CET 2021
> This patch adds closing of the PMD after running the tests.
>
> Signed-off-by: Adam Dybkowski <adamx.dybkowski at intel.com>
> ---
> app/test/test_cryptodev.c | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/app/test/test_cryptodev.c b/app/test/test_cryptodev.c
> index f91debc16..ea965a64a 100644
> --- a/app/test/test_cryptodev.c
> +++ b/app/test/test_cryptodev.c
> @@ -928,6 +928,7 @@ ut_teardown(void)
> struct crypto_testsuite_params *ts_params = &testsuite_params;
> struct crypto_unittest_params *ut_params = &unittest_params;
> struct rte_cryptodev_stats stats;
> + int res;
>
> /* free crypto session structure */
> #ifdef RTE_LIB_SECURITY
> @@ -976,8 +977,11 @@ ut_teardown(void)
>
> rte_cryptodev_stats_get(ts_params->valid_devs[0], &stats);
>
> - /* Stop the device */
> + /* Stop and close the device */
> rte_cryptodev_stop(ts_params->valid_devs[0]);
> + res = rte_cryptodev_close(ts_params->valid_devs[0]);
> + if (res)
> + RTE_LOG(ERR, USER1, "Crypto device close error %d\n", res);
Shouldn't this be part of testsuite_setup() instead of ut_teardown()?
In cases of vdev, devices are initialized as part of testsuite_setup().
Should we also call rte_cryptodev_queue_pair_release from ut_teardown?
Regards,
Akhil
More information about the dev
mailing list