[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/9] ethdev: support SubFunction representor

[Wang, Haiyue]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Xueming(Steven) Li <xuemingl at nvidia.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2021 13:49
> To: Wang, Haiyue <haiyue.wang at intel.com>; Stephen Hemminger <stephen at networkplumber.org>
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Slava Ovsiienko <viacheslavo at nvidia.com>; Asaf Penso <asafp at nvidia.com>
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/9] ethdev: support SubFunction representor
> 
> 
> 
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Wang, Haiyue <haiyue.wang at intel.com>
> >Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2021 7:46 PM
> >To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen at networkplumber.org>; Xueming(Steven) Li <xuemingl at nvidia.com>
> >Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Slava Ovsiienko <viacheslavo at nvidia.com>; Asaf Penso <asafp at nvidia.com>
> >Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/9] ethdev: support SubFunction representor
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: dev <dev-bounces at dpdk.org> On Behalf Of Stephen Hemminger
> >> Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2021 09:55
> >> To: Xueming Li <xuemingl at nvidia.com>
> >> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Viacheslav Ovsiienko <viacheslavo at nvidia.com>; Asaf
> >> Penso <asafp at nvidia.com>
> >> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/9] ethdev: support SubFunction
> >> representor
> >>
> >> On Sun, 14 Feb 2021 03:21:30 +0000
> >> Xueming Li <xuemingl at nvidia.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > SubFunction [1] is a portion of the PCI device, a SF netdev has its
> >> > own dedicated queues(txq, rxq). A SF netdev supports E-Switch
> >> > representation offload similar to existing PF and VF representors. A
> >> > SF shares PCI level resources with other SFs and/or with its parent PCI function.
> >> >
> >> > From SmartNIC perspective, when PCI device is shared for multi-host,
> >> > representors for host controller and host PF is required.
> >> >
> >> > This patch set introduces new representor types in addtion to
> >> > existing VF representor. Syntax:
> >> >
> >> > [[c#]pf#]vf#: VF port representor/s from controller/pf
> >> > [[c#]pf#]sf#: SF port representor/s from controller/pf
> >> > #: VF representor - for backwards compatibility
> >> >
> >> > "#" is number instance, list or range, valid examples:
> >> >   1, [1,3,5], [0-3], [0,2-4,6]
> >> >
> >> > For backward compatibility, this patch also introduces new netdev
> >> > capability to indicate the capability of supportting SF representor.
> >> >
> >> > Version history:
> >> >  RFC:
> >> >  	initial version [2]
> >> >  V2:
> >> >     - separate patch for represnetor infrastructure, controller, pf and
> >> >       sf.
> >> >     - replace representor ID macro with functions:
> >> >       rte_eth_representor_id_encode()
> >> >       rte_eth_representor_id_parse()
> >> >     - new patch to allow devargs with same PCI BDF but different
> >> >       representors.
> >> >     - other minor code updates according to comments, thanks Andrew!
> >> >     - update document
> >> >  V3:
> >> >     - improve probing of allowed devargs with same name.
> >> >     - parse single word of kvargs as key.
> >> >     - update kvargs test cases.
> >> >  V4:
> >> >     - split first representor refactor patch into
> >> >       1: add representor type
> >> >       2: refector representor list parsing
> >> >     - push the patch supporting multi-devargs for same device.
> >> >  V5:
> >> >     - add comments for parsing functions
> >> >     - update switch_representation.rst - Thanks Ajit
> >> >  V6:
> >> >     - split representor types into different patches, move to
> >> >       rte_ethdev.h
> >> >     - improvements of rte_eth_devargs_process_list() according to
> >> >       Andrew's suggestion
> >> >     - fixed PF probe failure for Intel i40e
> >> >     - replace ethdev SF capability with rte_eth_representor_info_get()
> >> >     - add new ethdev ops api to get representor info from PMD
> >> >     - replace representor ID encode/decode with conversion from
> >> >       representor info
> >> >     - change ethdev representor iterator to use new ID encoding
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Xueming Li (9):
> >> >   ethdev: introduce representor type
> >> >   ethdev: support representor port list
> >> >   ethdev: support new VF representor syntax
> >> >   ethdev: support sub function representor
> >> >   ethdev: support PF index in representor
> >> >   ethdev: support multi-host in representor
> >> >   ethdev: new API to get representor info
> >> >   ethdev: representor iterator compare complete info
> >> >   kvargs: update parser to support lists
> >> >
> >> >  app/test/test_kvargs.c                        |  46 ++++-
> >> >  config/rte_config.h                           |   1 +
> >> >  doc/guides/prog_guide/poll_mode_drv.rst       |  13 +-
> >> >  .../prog_guide/switch_representation.rst      |  35 +++-
> >> >  drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_ethdev.c                |   7 +
> >> >  drivers/net/enic/enic_ethdev.c                |   6 +
> >> >  drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c                |   7 +
> >> >  drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c              |   7 +
> >> >  drivers/net/mlx5/linux/mlx5_os.c              |  11 ++
> >> >  lib/librte_ethdev/ethdev_driver.h             |  49 ++++-
> >> >  lib/librte_ethdev/ethdev_private.c            | 173 ++++++++++++------
> >> >  lib/librte_ethdev/ethdev_private.h            |   3 -
> >> >  lib/librte_ethdev/rte_class_eth.c             |  40 ++--
> >> >  lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c                | 102 ++++++++++-
> >> >  lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.h                |  53 ++++++
> >> >  lib/librte_ethdev/version.map                 |   4 +
> >> >  lib/librte_kvargs/rte_kvargs.c                | 101 +++++++---
> >> >  17 files changed, 535 insertions(+), 123 deletions(-)
> >> >
> >>
> >> A couple of higher level design questions:
> >> 1. How does Linux and other OS handle this in their API?
> >> 2. This solution seems quite tied into a specific implementation on your hardware.
> >>    Is there a PCI standard for this?
> >
> >> 3. Maybe a more general solution where these were represented as buses would
> >>    allow for other connection methods in the future?
> >
> >It should be "auxiliary bus", I think. ;-)
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/base/auxiliary.c
> >
> >mlx5 subfunction support
> >https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=24a790da0ac4d9bcce2a9be
> cc8799241716672f6
> 
> Hi,
> 
> The Auxiliary driver for DPDK posted, welcome to have a look :)
> http://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20210311130113.31382-1-xuemingl@nvidia.com/

Cool. ;-)

> 
> Thanks
>