[dpdk-dev] RHEL7 failures

[Thinh Tran]

Hi,
I'm wondering how or when the CI would re-pick up the patches those were 
failed due to this issue?

Regards,
Thinh Tran

On 10/6/2021 10:40 PM, Zhang, Qi Z wrote:
> Hi Ferruh, David and Aman:
> 
> 	Sorry for late response due to PRC holiday.
> 	I have just tested the patch and there is no issue be detected for functions
> 	Thank you so much for the help!
> 
> Regards
> Qi
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yigit at intel.com>
>> Sent: Wednesday, October 6, 2021 5:46 AM
>> To: Lincoln Lavoie <lylavoie at iol.unh.edu>; dev <dev at dpdk.org>; Yang, Qiming
>> <qiming.yang at intel.com>; Zhang, Qi Z <qi.z.zhang at intel.com>
>> Cc: ci at dpdk.org; Aaron Conole <aconole at redhat.com>; dpdklab
>> <dpdklab at iol.unh.edu>; Singh, Aman Deep <aman.deep.singh at intel.com>;
>> David Marchand <david.marchand at redhat.com>
>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] RHEL7 failures
>>
>> On 10/5/2021 8:09 PM, Lincoln Lavoie wrote:
>>> Hello Qiming and Qi,
>>>
>>> The CI is picking up failures when building on RHEL7, where warnings
>>> are being treated as errors.  This looks like something has been
>>> merged into the mainline, as it's failing across all patches.
>>>
>>> Here is the specific failure:
>>>
>>> ./drivers/net/ice/base/ice_parser_rt.c: In function '_hv_bit_sel':
>>> ../drivers/net/ice/base/ice_parser_rt.c:201:2: error: dereferencing
>>> type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules
>>> [-Werror=strict-aliasing]
>>>     d64 = *(u64 *)&b[0];
>>>     ^
>>> ../drivers/net/ice/base/ice_parser_rt.c: In function '_reg_bit_sel':
>>> ../drivers/net/ice/base/ice_parser_rt.c:458:2: error: dereferencing
>>> type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules
>>> [-Werror=strict-aliasing]
>>>     d32 = *(u32 *)&v[0];
>>>     ^
>>> cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
>>>
>>> You can download a full set of logs from here (for a failing run):
>>> https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/patchsets/19162/
>>>
>>
>> Issue was reported by David, Aman sent the fix [1] and it is already merged by
>> David [2], it should be fixed now, can you please double check?
>>
>> [1]
>> https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20211005115754.34117-1-aman
>> .deep.singh at intel.com/
>>
>> [2]
>> https://git.dpdk.org/dpdk/commit/?id=16b809d144dc2df7f31695b5abc64a809
>> 021b154