[dpdk-dev] [dpdk-ci] RHEL7 failures
Brandon Lo
blo at iol.unh.edu
Mon Oct 11 19:17:35 CEST 2021
Hi Thinh,
I have started a rerun of the patch
https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/100042 (patchset
https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/patchsets/19066/).
You should see the new results reported over email soon.
Thanks,
Brandon
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 12:39 PM Thinh Tran <thinhtr at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Linconln,
>
> I have this patch set 100042 - build/ppc: enable build support for Power10
> https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/100042
>
> Thanks,
> Thinh Tran
>
>
>
> On 10/11/2021 9:42 AM, Lincoln Lavoie wrote:
> > Hi Thinh, The CI won't automatically go back and retest failures after a
> > patch was applied. This is a corner case, where a bad change was merged
> > and affected all patches downstream of that merge. We can retrigger
> > specific patches, just ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart
> > This Message Is From an External Sender
> > This message came from outside your organization.
> > ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd
> > Hi Thinh,
> >
> > The CI won't automatically go back and retest failures after a patch was
> > applied. This is a corner case, where a bad change was merged and
> > affected all patches downstream of that merge. We can retrigger
> > specific patches, just let us know the patch number or the URI of the
> > patch(es).
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Lincoln
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 10:39 AM Thinh Tran <thinhtr at linux.vnet.ibm.com
> > <mailto:thinhtr at linux.vnet.ibm.com>> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> > I'm wondering how or when the CI would re-pick up the patches those
> > were
> > failed due to this issue?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Thinh Tran
> >
> > On 10/6/2021 10:40 PM, Zhang, Qi Z wrote:
> > > Hi Ferruh, David and Aman:
> > >
> > > Sorry for late response due to PRC holiday.
> > > I have just tested the patch and there is no issue be
> > detected for functions
> > > Thank you so much for the help!
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > Qi
> > >
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yigit at intel.com
> > <mailto:ferruh.yigit at intel.com>>
> > >> Sent: Wednesday, October 6, 2021 5:46 AM
> > >> To: Lincoln Lavoie <lylavoie at iol.unh.edu
> > <mailto:lylavoie at iol.unh.edu>>; dev <dev at dpdk.org
> > <mailto:dev at dpdk.org>>; Yang, Qiming
> > >> <qiming.yang at intel.com <mailto:qiming.yang at intel.com>>; Zhang,
> > Qi Z <qi.z.zhang at intel.com <mailto:qi.z.zhang at intel.com>>
> > >> Cc: ci at dpdk.org <mailto:ci at dpdk.org>; Aaron Conole
> > <aconole at redhat.com <mailto:aconole at redhat.com>>; dpdklab
> > >> <dpdklab at iol.unh.edu <mailto:dpdklab at iol.unh.edu>>; Singh, Aman
> > Deep <aman.deep.singh at intel.com <mailto:aman.deep.singh at intel.com>>;
> > >> David Marchand <david.marchand at redhat.com
> > <mailto:david.marchand at redhat.com>>
> > >> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] RHEL7 failures
> > >>
> > >> On 10/5/2021 8:09 PM, Lincoln Lavoie wrote:
> > >>> Hello Qiming and Qi,
> > >>>
> > >>> The CI is picking up failures when building on RHEL7, where
> > warnings
> > >>> are being treated as errors. This looks like something has been
> > >>> merged into the mainline, as it's failing across all patches.
> > >>>
> > >>> Here is the specific failure:
> > >>>
> > >>> ./drivers/net/ice/base/ice_parser_rt.c: In function '_hv_bit_sel':
> > >>> ../drivers/net/ice/base/ice_parser_rt.c:201:2: error: dereferencing
> > >>> type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules
> > >>> [-Werror=strict-aliasing]
> > >>> d64 = *(u64 *)&b[0];
> > >>> ^
> > >>> ../drivers/net/ice/base/ice_parser_rt.c: In function
> > '_reg_bit_sel':
> > >>> ../drivers/net/ice/base/ice_parser_rt.c:458:2: error: dereferencing
> > >>> type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules
> > >>> [-Werror=strict-aliasing]
> > >>> d32 = *(u32 *)&v[0];
> > >>> ^
> > >>> cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
> > >>>
> > >>> You can download a full set of logs from here (for a failing run):
> > >>> https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/patchsets/19162/
> > <https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/patchsets/19162/>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> Issue was reported by David, Aman sent the fix [1] and it is
> > already merged by
> > >> David [2], it should be fixed now, can you please double check?
> > >>
> > >> [1]
> > >>
> > https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20211005115754.34117-1-aman
> > <https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20211005115754.34117-1-aman>
> > >> .deep.singh at intel.com/ <http://deep.singh@intel.com/>
> > >>
> > >> [2]
> > >>
> > https://git.dpdk.org/dpdk/commit/?id=16b809d144dc2df7f31695b5abc64a809
> > <https://git.dpdk.org/dpdk/commit/?id=16b809d144dc2df7f31695b5abc64a809>
> > >> 021b154
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *Lincoln Lavoie*
> > Principal Engineer, Broadband Technologies
> > 21 Madbury Rd., Ste. 100, Durham, NH 03824
> > lylavoie at iol.unh.edu <mailto:lylavoie at iol.unh.edu>
> > https://www.iol.unh.edu <https://www.iol.unh.edu>
> > +1-603-674-2755 (m)
> > <https://www.iol.unh.edu>
--
Brandon Lo
UNH InterOperability Laboratory
21 Madbury Rd, Suite 100, Durham, NH 03824
blo at iol.unh.edu
www.iol.unh.edu
More information about the dev
mailing list