[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] patchset for bnxt PMD
Ajit Khaparde
ajit.khaparde at broadcom.com
Tue Oct 12 22:30:30 CEST 2021
On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 12:49 PM Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit at intel.com> wrote:
>
> On 10/12/2021 8:03 PM, Ajit Khaparde wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 11:16 AM Ajit Khaparde
> > <ajit.khaparde at broadcom.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 11:14 AM Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit at intel.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On 10/7/2021 5:54 PM, Ajit Khaparde wrote:
> >>>> On Wed, Oct 6, 2021 at 8:23 PM Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde at broadcom.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Apart from fixing an issue with Rx queue state at startup,
> >>>>> this patchset enhances support for RSS action and
> >>>>> optimizes the mbuf requirement at startup by creating the
> >>>>> aggregation rings only when needed (rx_scatter is enabled).
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Please apply!
> >>>>>
> >>>> Patchset applied to dpdk-next-net-brcm.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Hi Ajit,
> >>>
> >>> dpdk-next-net-brcm conflicts with next-net because of some patches
> >>> updating bnxt in next-net.
> >>> Can you please rebase 'dpdk-next-net-brcm' on top of latest next-net?
> >> Sure. I will send an email once it's ready.
> > Done. I have rebased the repo to the latest next-net/main
> > and merged the patches. Please try now.
> >
>
> Hi Ajit,
>
> I am getting lots of checkpatch warnings on the patches in your tree,
> but I don't see them in the patchwork. Warnings can be because of the
> updates during rebase.
>
> If there is code change during rebase, to not have a diverge between
> the patch in the patchwork and what we are merging, can you please send
> and updated version of the effected patches first?
There is no code change made during the rebase.
My checkpatch run did not point out anything.
But let me try again. Thanks Ferruh.
Thanks
Ajit
> This lets us see the CI results and later they can be merge in your tree
> again.
>
More information about the dev
mailing list