[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 00/10] net/sfc: add support for tunnel offload
Ferruh Yigit
ferruh.yigit at intel.com
Wed Oct 13 12:45:29 CEST 2021
On 10/13/2021 1:24 AM, Ivan Malov wrote:
> The first 6 patches comprise the fundamental part of the series.
> They are trying to be future-proof with respect to the planned
> HW/FW changes. 4 more patches form the adaptation part of some
> sort to make the offload work on the currently available HW/FW.
>
> This patch series should be applied on top of another patch
> series named "A means to negotiate delivery of Rx meta data":
> https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=19373
>
> Changes in v2:
> * Rebase on top of v4 of the above mentioned patch series
>
> Changes in v3:
> * Rebase as per request by Ferruh Yigit
>
> Ivan Malov (10):
> net/sfc: fence off 8 bits in Rx mark for tunnel offload
> common/sfc_efx/base: add API to set RECIRC ID in outer rules
> net/sfc: support JUMP flows in tunnel offload
> common/sfc_efx/base: add RECIRC ID match in action rules API
> net/sfc: support GROUP flows in tunnel offload
> net/sfc: implement control path operations in tunnel offload
> net/sfc: override match on ETH in tunnel offload JUMP rules
> net/sfc: use action rules in tunnel offload JUMP rules
> net/sfc: support counters in tunnel offload JUMP rules
> net/sfc: refine pattern of GROUP flows in tunnel offload
>
The flow API action/pattern names are uppercase in the patch title,
but I remember Thomas is converting them to lowercase in the main repo.
@Thomas, @Ori, what is the preferred syntax in the patch title?
More information about the dev
mailing list