[dpdk-dev] [RFC 01/14] vhost: move async data in a dedicated structure
Maxime Coquelin
maxime.coquelin at redhat.com
Thu Oct 14 10:54:25 CEST 2021
On 10/14/21 05:24, Hu, Jiayu wrote:
> Hi Maxime,
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin at redhat.com>
>> Sent: Friday, October 8, 2021 6:00 AM
>> To: dev at dpdk.org; Xia, Chenbo <chenbo.xia at intel.com>; Hu, Jiayu
>> <jiayu.hu at intel.com>; Wang, YuanX <yuanx.wang at intel.com>; Ma,
>> WenwuX <wenwux.ma at intel.com>; Richardson, Bruce
>> <bruce.richardson at intel.com>; Mcnamara, John
>> <john.mcnamara at intel.com>
>> Cc: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin at redhat.com>
>> Subject: [RFC 01/14] vhost: move async data in a dedicated structure
>>
>> This patch moves async-related metadata from vhost_virtqueue to a
>> dedicated struct. It makes it clear which fields are async related, and also
>> saves some memory when async feature is not in use.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin at redhat.com>
>> ---
>> lib/vhost/vhost.c | 129 ++++++++++++++++-------------------------
>> lib/vhost/vhost.h | 53 ++++++++---------
>> lib/vhost/vhost_user.c | 4 +-
>> lib/vhost/virtio_net.c | 114 +++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>> 4 files changed, 140 insertions(+), 160 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/lib/vhost/vhost.c b/lib/vhost/vhost.c index
>> 9540522dac..58f72b633c 100644
>> --- a/lib/vhost/vhost.c
>> +++ b/lib/vhost/vhost.c
>> @@ -340,19 +340,15 @@ cleanup_device(struct virtio_net *dev, int destroy)
>> static void vhost_free_async_mem(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq) {
>> - rte_free(vq->async_pkts_info);
>> + rte_free(vq->async->pkts_info);
>
> Apps may unregister async in vring_state_changed() explicitly when
> vring is disabled. In this case, rte_vhost_async_channel_unregister()
> will call vhost_free_async_mem() first, so that vq->async becomes NULL.
> But after then device is destroyed, free_vq() calls vhost_free_async_mem()
> again. "rte_free(vq->async->pkts_info)" will try to read a NULL pointer,
> which will cause segment fault.
Good catch, I'll add a check of vq->async before dereferencing it.
>>
>> - rte_free(vq->async_buffers_packed);
>> - vq->async_buffers_packed = NULL;
>> - rte_free(vq->async_descs_split);
>> - vq->async_descs_split = NULL;
>> + rte_free(vq->async->buffers_packed);
>> + vq->async->buffers_packed = NULL;
>> + rte_free(vq->async->descs_split);
>> + vq->async->descs_split = NULL;
>>
>> - rte_free(vq->it_pool);
>> - rte_free(vq->vec_pool);
>> -
>> - vq->async_pkts_info = NULL;
>> - vq->it_pool = NULL;
>> - vq->vec_pool = NULL;
>> + rte_free(vq->async);
>> + vq->async = NULL;
>> }
>>
>> void
>> @@ -1629,77 +1625,63 @@ async_channel_register(int vid, uint16_t
>> queue_id, {
>> struct virtio_net *dev = get_device(vid);
>> struct vhost_virtqueue *vq = dev->virtqueue[queue_id];
>> + struct vhost_async *async;
>> + int node = vq->numa_node;
>>
>> - if (unlikely(vq->async_registered)) {
>> + if (unlikely(vq->async)) {
>> VHOST_LOG_CONFIG(ERR,
>> - "async register failed: channel already registered "
>> - "(vid %d, qid: %d)\n", vid, queue_id);
>> + "async register failed: already registered
>> (vid %d, qid: %d)\n",
>> + vid, queue_id);
>> return -1;
>> }
>>
>> - vq->async_pkts_info = rte_malloc_socket(NULL,
>> - vq->size * sizeof(struct async_inflight_info),
>> - RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE, vq->numa_node);
>> - if (!vq->async_pkts_info) {
>> - vhost_free_async_mem(vq);
>> - VHOST_LOG_CONFIG(ERR,
>> - "async register failed: cannot allocate memory for
>> async_pkts_info "
>> - "(vid %d, qid: %d)\n", vid, queue_id);
>> + async = rte_zmalloc_socket(NULL, sizeof(struct vhost_async), 0,
>> node);
>> + if (!async) {
>> + VHOST_LOG_CONFIG(ERR, "failed to allocate async metadata
>> (vid %d, qid: %d)\n",
>> + vid, queue_id);
>> return -1;
>> }
>>
>> - vq->it_pool = rte_malloc_socket(NULL,
>> - VHOST_MAX_ASYNC_IT * sizeof(struct
>> rte_vhost_iov_iter),
>> - RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE, vq->numa_node);
>> - if (!vq->it_pool) {
>> - vhost_free_async_mem(vq);
>> - VHOST_LOG_CONFIG(ERR,
>> - "async register failed: cannot allocate memory for
>> it_pool "
>> - "(vid %d, qid: %d)\n", vid, queue_id);
>> - return -1;
>> - }
>> -
>> - vq->vec_pool = rte_malloc_socket(NULL,
>> - VHOST_MAX_ASYNC_VEC * sizeof(struct iovec),
>> - RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE, vq->numa_node);
>> - if (!vq->vec_pool) {
>> - vhost_free_async_mem(vq);
>> - VHOST_LOG_CONFIG(ERR,
>> - "async register failed: cannot allocate memory for
>> vec_pool "
>> - "(vid %d, qid: %d)\n", vid, queue_id);
>> - return -1;
>> + async->pkts_info = rte_malloc_socket(NULL, vq->size * sizeof(struct
>> async_inflight_info),
>> + RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE, node);
>> + if (async->pkts_info) {
>
> It should be "if (!async->pkts_info)".
Correct.
You can notice I didn't lie when I said it was only compile-tested in
the cover-letter! :)
Regards,
Maxime
> Thanks,
> Jiayu
>
More information about the dev
mailing list