[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] vhost: mark vDPA driver API as internal

[Maxime Coquelin]

On 10/28/21 14:38, David Marchand wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 2:03 PM Maxime Coquelin
> <maxime.coquelin at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> This patch marks the vDPA driver APIs as internal and
>> rename the corresponding header file.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin at redhat.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/vdpa/ifc/ifcvf_vdpa.c            |  2 +-
>>   drivers/vdpa/mlx5/mlx5_vdpa.h            |  2 +-
>>   lib/vhost/meson.build                    |  4 +++-
>>   lib/vhost/vdpa.c                         |  2 +-
>>   lib/vhost/{rte_vdpa_dev.h => vdpa_dev.h} |  6 ++++++
> 
> It is more explicit it is a driver-only header if we rename as
> vdpa_driver.h or vdpa_pmd.h.

Agree, I can take the opportunity to rename it to vdpa_driver.h.

> [snip]
> 
>> @@ -86,3 +82,12 @@ EXPERIMENTAL {
>>          rte_vhost_async_channel_unregister_thread_unsafe;
>>          rte_vhost_clear_queue_thread_unsafe;
>>   };
>> +
>> +INTERNAL {
>> +       global;
>> +
>> +       rte_vdpa_register_device;
>> +       rte_vdpa_unregister_device;
>> +       rte_vhost_host_notifier_ctrl;
>> +       rte_vdpa_relay_vring_used;
>> +};
> 
> Alphabetical order, please.

Will do.

> Please also add a note in the release notes.
> 
> Strictly speaking, this is an announced API change.
> Cc: techboard.

Correct, I think we need a vote from the techboard.

@Techboard, this API change felt through the cracks.

Please note that the drivers APIs that are being marked as
internal were already moved in a dedicated header last year,
so any application are likely not using these APIs.
There is a patch for mlx5 vdpa that introduces a new entry
to struct rte_vdpa_dev_ops, so I think it would be better
to have these APIs marked as internal before mlx5 patch is
applied.

Thanks in advance,
Maxime

> 
> The rest lgtm.
> Thanks.
>