[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 5/5] lib/distributor: use wait event scheme
Jerin Jacob
jerinjacobk at gmail.com
Fri Oct 29 15:58:16 CEST 2021
On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 1:50 PM Feifei Wang <feifei.wang2 at arm.com> wrote:
>
> Instead of polling for bufptr64 to be updated, use
> wait event for this case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Feifei Wang <feifei.wang2 at arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang at arm.com>
With the change in the subject as distributor: ...
Probably can be fixed in merge time.
Acked-by: Jerin Jacob <jerinj at marvell.com>
> ---
> lib/distributor/rte_distributor_single.c | 10 ++++------
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/distributor/rte_distributor_single.c b/lib/distributor/rte_distributor_single.c
> index f4725b1d0b..d52b24a453 100644
> --- a/lib/distributor/rte_distributor_single.c
> +++ b/lib/distributor/rte_distributor_single.c
> @@ -33,9 +33,8 @@ rte_distributor_request_pkt_single(struct rte_distributor_single *d,
> union rte_distributor_buffer_single *buf = &d->bufs[worker_id];
> int64_t req = (((int64_t)(uintptr_t)oldpkt) << RTE_DISTRIB_FLAG_BITS)
> | RTE_DISTRIB_GET_BUF;
> - while (unlikely(__atomic_load_n(&buf->bufptr64, __ATOMIC_RELAXED)
> - & RTE_DISTRIB_FLAGS_MASK))
> - rte_pause();
> + rte_wait_event(&buf->bufptr64, RTE_DISTRIB_FLAGS_MASK,
> + !=, 0, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
>
> /* Sync with distributor on GET_BUF flag. */
> __atomic_store_n(&(buf->bufptr64), req, __ATOMIC_RELEASE);
> @@ -74,9 +73,8 @@ rte_distributor_return_pkt_single(struct rte_distributor_single *d,
> union rte_distributor_buffer_single *buf = &d->bufs[worker_id];
> uint64_t req = (((int64_t)(uintptr_t)oldpkt) << RTE_DISTRIB_FLAG_BITS)
> | RTE_DISTRIB_RETURN_BUF;
> - while (unlikely(__atomic_load_n(&buf->bufptr64, __ATOMIC_RELAXED)
> - & RTE_DISTRIB_FLAGS_MASK))
> - rte_pause();
> + rte_wait_event(&buf->bufptr64, RTE_DISTRIB_FLAGS_MASK,
> + !=, 0, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
>
> /* Sync with distributor on RETURN_BUF flag. */
> __atomic_store_n(&(buf->bufptr64), req, __ATOMIC_RELEASE);
> --
> 2.25.1
>
More information about the dev
mailing list