[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/ice: add ability to reduce the Rx latency
Kevin Traynor
ktraynor at redhat.com
Tue Sep 28 11:22:27 CEST 2021
On 22/09/2021 03:16, Zhang, AlvinX wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Kevin Traynor <ktraynor at redhat.com>
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2021 5:21 PM
>> To: Zhang, AlvinX <alvinx.zhang at intel.com>; Zhang, Qi Z
>> <qi.z.zhang at intel.com>; Guo, Junfeng <junfeng.guo at intel.com>
>> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/ice: add ability to reduce the Rx latency
>>
>> On 18/09/2021 02:33, Zhang, AlvinX wrote:
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Kevin Traynor <ktraynor at redhat.com>
>>>> Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2021 1:25 AM
>>>> To: Zhang, AlvinX <alvinx.zhang at intel.com>; Zhang, Qi Z
>>>> <qi.z.zhang at intel.com>; Guo, Junfeng <junfeng.guo at intel.com>
>>>> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
>>>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/ice: add ability to reduce the Rx
>>>> latency
>>>>
>>>> On 14/09/2021 02:31, Alvin Zhang wrote:
>>>>> This patch adds a devarg parameter to enable/disable reducing the Rx
>>>>> latency.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Alvin Zhang <alvinx.zhang at intel.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> doc/guides/nics/ice.rst | 8 ++++++++
>>>>> drivers/net/ice/ice_ethdev.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++---
>>>>> drivers/net/ice/ice_ethdev.h | 1 +
>>>>> 3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/doc/guides/nics/ice.rst b/doc/guides/nics/ice.rst index
>>>>> 5bc472f..3db0430 100644
>>>>> --- a/doc/guides/nics/ice.rst
>>>>> +++ b/doc/guides/nics/ice.rst
>>>>> @@ -219,6 +219,14 @@ Runtime Config Options
>>>>>
>>>>> These ICE_DBG_XXX are defined in
>> ``drivers/net/ice/base/ice_type.h``.
>>>>>
>>>>> +- ``Reduce Rx interrupts and latency`` (default ``0``)
>>>>> +
>>>>> + vRAN workloads require low latency DPDK interface for the front
>>>>> + haul interface connection to Radio. Now we can reduce Rx
>>>>> + interrupts and latency by specify ``1`` for parameter ``rx-low-latency``::
>>>>> +
>>>>> + -a 0000:88:00.0,rx-low-latency=1
>>>>> +
>>>>
>>>> When would a user select this and when not? What is the trade off?
>>>>
>>>> The text is a bit unclear. It looks below like it reduces the
>>>> interrupt latency, but not the number of interrupts. Maybe I got it wrong.
>>>
>>> Yes, it reduces the interrupt latency, We will refine the doc in next
>>> patch.
>>>
>>
>> Thanks, the text in v2 is clearer.
>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Driver compilation and testing
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ice/ice_ethdev.c
>>>>> b/drivers/net/ice/ice_ethdev.c index a4cd39c..85662e4 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/net/ice/ice_ethdev.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ice/ice_ethdev.c
>>>>> @@ -29,12 +29,14 @@
>>>>> #define ICE_PIPELINE_MODE_SUPPORT_ARG
>> "pipeline-mode-support"
>>>>> #define ICE_PROTO_XTR_ARG "proto_xtr"
>>>>> #define ICE_HW_DEBUG_MASK_ARG "hw_debug_mask"
>>>>> +#define ICE_RX_LOW_LATENCY "rx-low-latency"
>>>>>
>>>>> static const char * const ice_valid_args[] = {
>>>>> ICE_SAFE_MODE_SUPPORT_ARG,
>>>>> ICE_PIPELINE_MODE_SUPPORT_ARG,
>>>>> ICE_PROTO_XTR_ARG,
>>>>> ICE_HW_DEBUG_MASK_ARG,
>>>>> + ICE_RX_LOW_LATENCY,
>>>>> NULL
>>>>> };
>>>>>
>>>>> @@ -1827,6 +1829,9 @@ static int ice_parse_devargs(struct
>>>>> rte_eth_dev
>>>> *dev)
>>>>> if (ret)
>>>>> goto bail;
>>>>>
>>>>> + ret = rte_kvargs_process(kvlist, ICE_RX_LOW_LATENCY,
>>>>> + &parse_bool, &ad->devargs.rx_low_latency);
>>>>> +
>>>>> bail:
>>>>> rte_kvargs_free(kvlist);
>>>>> return ret;
>>>>> @@ -3144,8 +3149,9 @@ static int ice_init_rss(struct ice_pf *pf) {
>>>>> struct ice_hw *hw = ICE_VSI_TO_HW(vsi);
>>>>> uint32_t val, val_tx;
>>>>> - int i;
>>>>> + int rx_low_latency, i;
>>>>>
>>>>> + rx_low_latency = vsi->adapter->devargs.rx_low_latency;
>>>>> for (i = 0; i < nb_queue; i++) {
>>>>> /*do actual bind*/
>>>>> val = (msix_vect & QINT_RQCTL_MSIX_INDX_M) | @@ -3155,8
>>>> +3161,21 @@
>>>>> static int ice_init_rss(struct ice_pf *pf)
>>>>>
>>>>> PMD_DRV_LOG(INFO, "queue %d is binding to vect %d",
>>>>> base_queue + i, msix_vect);
>>>>> +
>>>>> /* set ITR0 value */
>>>>> - ICE_WRITE_REG(hw, GLINT_ITR(0, msix_vect), 0x2);
>>>>> + if (rx_low_latency) {
>>>>> + /**
>>>>> + * Empirical configuration for optimal real time
>>>>> + * latency reduced interrupt throttling to 2us
>>>>> + */
>>>>> + ICE_WRITE_REG(hw, GLINT_ITR(0, msix_vect), 0x1);
>>>>
>>>> Why not set this to 0? "Setting the INTERVAL to zero enables
>>>> immediate interrupt."
>>>>
>>
>> Didn't see a reply to this comment?
>>
>> I'm not requesting a change, just asking if there is a reason you didn't choose the
>> lowest latency setting, and if you should?
>
> Setting the INTERVAL to zero enable immediate interrupt, which will cause more interrupts at high packets rates,
> and more interrupts will consume more PCI bandwidth and CPU cycles.
> Setting to 2us is a performance trade-off.
ok, thanks.
>>
>>>>> + ICE_WRITE_REG(hw, QRX_ITR(base_queue + i),
>>>>> + QRX_ITR_NO_EXPR_M);
>>>>> + } else {
>>>>> + ICE_WRITE_REG(hw, GLINT_ITR(0, msix_vect), 0x2);
>>>>> + ICE_WRITE_REG(hw, QRX_ITR(base_queue + i), 0);
>>>>> + }
>>>>> +
>>>>> ICE_WRITE_REG(hw, QINT_RQCTL(base_queue + i), val);
>>>>> ICE_WRITE_REG(hw, QINT_TQCTL(base_queue + i), val_tx);
>>>>> }
>>>>> @@ -5314,7 +5333,8 @@ static int ice_xstats_get_names(__rte_unused
>>>> struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
>>>>> ICE_HW_DEBUG_MASK_ARG "=0xXXX"
>>>>> ICE_PROTO_XTR_ARG
>>>> "=[queue:]<vlan|ipv4|ipv6|ipv6_flow|tcp|ip_offset>"
>>>>> ICE_SAFE_MODE_SUPPORT_ARG "=<0|1>"
>>>>> - ICE_PIPELINE_MODE_SUPPORT_ARG "=<0|1>");
>>>>> + ICE_PIPELINE_MODE_SUPPORT_ARG "=<0|1>"
>>>>> + ICE_RX_LOW_LATENCY "=<0|1>");
>>>>>
>>>>> RTE_LOG_REGISTER_SUFFIX(ice_logtype_init, init, NOTICE);
>>>>> RTE_LOG_REGISTER_SUFFIX(ice_logtype_driver, driver, NOTICE); diff
>>>>> --git a/drivers/net/ice/ice_ethdev.h b/drivers/net/ice/ice_ethdev.h
>>>>> index b4bf651..c61cc1f 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/net/ice/ice_ethdev.h
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ice/ice_ethdev.h
>>>>> @@ -463,6 +463,7 @@ struct ice_pf {
>>>>> * Cache devargs parse result.
>>>>> */
>>>>> struct ice_devargs {
>>>>> + int rx_low_latency;
>>>>> int safe_mode_support;
>>>>> uint8_t proto_xtr_dflt;
>>>>> int pipe_mode_support;
>>>>>
>>>
>
More information about the dev
mailing list