[PATCH 03/20] common/cnxk: adjust shaper rates to lower boundaries
Nithin Kumar Dabilpuram
ndabilpuram at marvell.com
Tue Feb 22 19:19:46 CET 2022
Please see inline.
On 2/17/22 6:50 PM, Jerin Jacob wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 7, 2022 at 1:00 PM Nithin Dabilpuram
> <ndabilpuram at marvell.com> wrote:
>>
>> From: Satha Rao <skoteshwar at marvell.com>
>>
>> New api to get floor values for a requested shaper rate, which can assure
>
> Since it is internal API, no need to mention in the comment log
>
>> packets should never be transmitted at a rate higher than configured.
>>
>> Keep the old api to get HW suggested values.
>> And introduce new parameter to select appropriate api.
>
> api -> API
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Satha Rao <skoteshwar at marvell.com>
>> ---
>> +static uint64_t
>> +nix_tm_shaper_rate_conv_floor(uint64_t value, uint64_t *exponent_p,
>> + uint64_t *mantissa_p, uint64_t *div_exp_p)
>> +{
>> + uint64_t div_exp, exponent, mantissa;
>> +
>> + /* Boundary checks */
>> + if (value < NIX_TM_MIN_SHAPER_RATE || value > NIX_TM_MAX_SHAPER_RATE)
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + if (value <= NIX_TM_SHAPER_RATE(0, 0, 0)) {
>> + /* Calculate rate div_exp and mantissa using
>> + * the following formula:
>> + *
>> + * value = (2E6 * (256 + mantissa)
>> + * / ((1 << div_exp) * 256))
>> + */
>> + div_exp = 0;
>> + exponent = 0;
>> + mantissa = NIX_TM_MAX_RATE_MANTISSA;
>> +
>> + while (value <= (NIX_TM_SHAPER_RATE_CONST / (1 << div_exp)))
>> + div_exp += 1;
>> +
>> + while (value <= ((NIX_TM_SHAPER_RATE_CONST * (256 + mantissa)) /
>> + ((1 << div_exp) * 256)))
>> + mantissa -= 1;
>
> Please move this as another static function.
This is not same as the non-floor function though it looks same. The
while loops terminate in <= in this function. Do you still need sub
functions for these ?
>
>
>> + } else {
>> + /* Calculate rate exponent and mantissa using
>> + * the following formula:
>> + *
>> + * value = (2E6 * ((256 + mantissa) << exponent)) / 256
>> + *
>> + */
>> + div_exp = 0;
>> + exponent = NIX_TM_MAX_RATE_EXPONENT;
>> + mantissa = NIX_TM_MAX_RATE_MANTISSA;
>> +
>> + while (value <= (NIX_TM_SHAPER_RATE_CONST * (1 << exponent)))
>> + exponent -= 1;
>> +
>> + while (value <= ((NIX_TM_SHAPER_RATE_CONST *
>> + ((256 + mantissa) << exponent)) /
>> + 256))
>> + mantissa -= 1;
>
> Please move this as another static function.
Same comment as above.
>
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (div_exp > NIX_TM_MAX_RATE_DIV_EXP ||
>> + exponent > NIX_TM_MAX_RATE_EXPONENT ||
>> + mantissa > NIX_TM_MAX_RATE_MANTISSA)
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + if (div_exp_p)
>> + *div_exp_p = div_exp;
>> + if (exponent_p)
>> + *exponent_p = exponent;
>> + if (mantissa_p)
>> + *mantissa_p = mantissa;
>> +
>> + /* Calculate real rate value */
>> + return NIX_TM_SHAPER_RATE(exponent, mantissa, div_exp);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static uint64_t
>> +nix_tm_shaper_rate_conv_exact(uint64_t value, uint64_t *exponent_p,
>> + uint64_t *mantissa_p, uint64_t *div_exp_p)
>> {
>> uint64_t div_exp, exponent, mantissa;
>>
>> @@ -188,6 +251,23 @@ nix_tm_shaper_rate_conv(uint64_t value, uint64_t *exponent_p,
>> return NIX_TM_SHAPER_RATE(exponent, mantissa, div_exp);
>> }
>>
>> +/* With zero accuracy we will tune parameters as defined by HW,
>> + * non zero accuracy will keep the parameters close to lower values
>> + * and make sure long term shaper rate will not exceed requested rate.
>
> long-term
> requested -> the requested
More information about the dev
mailing list