[PATCH 1/2] net/cnxk: update meter bpf ID in rq
Ferruh Yigit
ferruh.yigit at intel.com
Tue Jan 11 13:46:05 CET 2022
On 11/30/2021 6:41 AM, Rakesh Kudurumalla wrote:
> Patch updates configured meter bpf is in rq context
> during meter creation
RQ is receive queue, right? Can you please use the long version for clarification?
>
> Signed-off-by: Rakesh Kudurumalla <rkudurumalla at marvell.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/cnxk/cn10k_rte_flow.c | 9 ++++-----
> drivers/net/cnxk/cnxk_ethdev_mtr.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++-------
> 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/cnxk/cn10k_rte_flow.c b/drivers/net/cnxk/cn10k_rte_flow.c
> index b830abe63e..402bb1c72f 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/cnxk/cn10k_rte_flow.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/cnxk/cn10k_rte_flow.c
> @@ -36,20 +36,20 @@ cn10k_mtr_configure(struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev,
> for (i = 0; actions[i].type != RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_END; i++) {
> if (actions[i].type == RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_METER) {
> mtr_conf = (const struct rte_flow_action_meter
> - *)(actions->conf);
> + *)(actions[i].conf);
> mtr_id = mtr_conf->mtr_id;
> is_mtr_act = true;
> }
> if (actions[i].type == RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_QUEUE) {
> q_conf = (const struct rte_flow_action_queue
> - *)(actions->conf);
> + *)(actions[i].conf);
> if (is_mtr_act)
> nix_mtr_rq_update(eth_dev, mtr_id, 1,
> &q_conf->index);
> }
> if (actions[i].type == RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_RSS) {
> rss_conf = (const struct rte_flow_action_rss
> - *)(actions->conf);
> + *)(actions[i].conf);
> if (is_mtr_act)
> nix_mtr_rq_update(eth_dev, mtr_id,
> rss_conf->queue_num,
> @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ cn10k_rss_action_validate(struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev,
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - if (eth_dev->data->dev_conf.rxmode.mq_mode != RTE_ETH_MQ_RX_RSS) {
> + if (eth_dev->data->dev_conf.rxmode.mq_mode != ETH_MQ_RX_RSS) {
This change seems unintended. Please keep the original value.
<...>
> if (!capa)
> return -rte_mtr_error_set(error, EINVAL,
> - RTE_MTR_ERROR_TYPE_MTR_PARAMS, NULL,
> - "NULL input parameter");
> + RTE_MTR_ERROR_TYPE_MTR_PARAMS, NULL,
> + "NULL input parameter");
>
Previous indentation looks more consistent with DPDK coding guide.
More information about the dev
mailing list