[PATCH v2 7/9] vhost: remove multi-line logs

[Maxime Coquelin]

Hi Chenbo,

On 1/26/22 04:27, Xia, Chenbo wrote:
> Hi Maxime,
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin at redhat.com>
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2022 7:25 PM
>> To: dev at dpdk.org; Xia, Chenbo <chenbo.xia at intel.com>;
>> david.marchand at redhat.com
>> Cc: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin at redhat.com>
>> Subject: [PATCH v2 7/9] vhost: remove multi-line logs
>>
>> This patch replaces multi-lines logs in multiple single-
>> line logs in order to ease logs filtering based on their
>> socket path.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin at redhat.com>
>> ---
>>   lib/vhost/socket.c     |  10 ++--
>>   lib/vhost/vhost.c      |   8 ++--
>>   lib/vhost/vhost_user.c | 106 +++++++++++++++++++----------------------
>>   3 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
>>

...

>> @@ -1122,8 +1121,7 @@ vhost_user_postcopy_region_register(struct virtio_net
>> *dev,
>>
>>   	if (ioctl(dev->postcopy_ufd, UFFDIO_REGISTER,
>>   				&reg_struct)) {
>> -		VHOST_LOG_CONFIG(ERR, "(%s) failed to register ufd for region "
>> -				"%" PRIx64 " - %" PRIx64 " (ufd = %d) %s\n",
>> +		VHOST_LOG_CONFIG(ERR, "(%s) failed to register ufd for region %"
>> PRIx64 " - %" PRIx64 " (ufd = %d) %s\n",
> 
> This line is > 100 chars, and I think the original one is fine for log filtering
> or using log to search code.
> What do you think?

Makes sense, I will revert this change in v3.

Thanks,
Maxime