[PATCH v2 1/4] crypto: use single buffer for asymmetric session

Zhang, Roy Fan roy.fan.zhang at intel.com
Thu Jan 27 12:03:41 CET 2022


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Power, Ciara <ciara.power at intel.com>
> Sent: Monday, January 24, 2022 3:04 PM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Cc: Zhang, Roy Fan <roy.fan.zhang at intel.com>; gakhil at marvell.com;
> anoobj at marvell.com; mdr at ashroe.eu; Power, Ciara
> <ciara.power at intel.com>; Doherty, Declan <declan.doherty at intel.com>;
> Ankur Dwivedi <adwivedi at marvell.com>; Tejasree Kondoj
> <ktejasree at marvell.com>; Griffin, John <john.griffin at intel.com>; Trahe,
> Fiona <fiona.trahe at intel.com>; Jain, Deepak K <deepak.k.jain at intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH v2 1/4] crypto: use single buffer for asymmetric session
> 
> Rather than using a session buffer that contains pointers to private
> session data elsewhere, have a single session buffer.
> This session is created for a driver ID, and the mempool element
> contains space for the max session private data needed for any driver.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ciara Power <ciara.power at intel.com>
> 
> ---
Although Anoob had slightly different idea on missed iova address to the session private data,
the general approach looks ok to me.
Acked-by: Fan Zhang <roy.fan.zhang at intel.com>


More information about the dev mailing list