[PATCH v9 0/4] add an api to support proto based buffer split
Ding, Xuan
xuan.ding at intel.com
Mon Jul 11 12:08:14 CEST 2022
Hi,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas at monjalon.net>
> Sent: Thursday, July 7, 2022 5:10 PM
> To: Wu, WenxuanX <wenxuanx.wu at intel.com>; Ding, Xuan
> <xuan.ding at intel.com>
> Cc: andrew.rybchenko at oktetlabs.ru; dev at dpdk.org; Li, Xiaoyun
> <xiaoyun.li at intel.com>; ferruh.yigit at xilinx.com; dev at dpdk.org; Zhang,
> Yuying <yuying.zhang at intel.com>; Zhang, Qi Z <qi.z.zhang at intel.com>;
> jerinjacobk at gmail.com; stephen at networkplumber.org; Zhang, Qi Z
> <qi.z.zhang at intel.com>; Richardson, Bruce <bruce.richardson at intel.com>;
> Mcnamara, John <john.mcnamara at intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/4] add an api to support proto based buffer split
>
> 21/06/2022 10:56, Ding, Xuan:
> > This protocol based buffer split patch series have been updated to v9.
> > Sincerely thank you for the effort you put into this series.
> >
> > Hope to know your considerations about this series now.
> > Do you think is it possible to get in 22.07? Or there are still some critical
> gaps need to be solved?
> > Because we don't hope the same thing happens in 22.11.
>
> My quick comment, I think you must better care about all details.
> Precise explanations are very important.
> It is more encouraging to review when we see the author tried hard to avoid
> any confusion or approximation.
Thanks a lot to all the reviewers for the effort on this series.
So far, although we tried to make the explanation or documentation detailed,
there must have some places that are not clearly explained or the doc is not good enough.
We will do more self-checks and try to refine where it might not be clear.
Your comments are welcome.
Regards,
Xuan
>
>
More information about the dev
mailing list