[PATCH v4 4/7] drivers/baseband: update PMDs to expose queue per operation
Tom Rix
trix at redhat.com
Mon Jul 18 15:21:18 CEST 2022
On 7/7/22 10:19 AM, Chautru, Nicolas wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Tom Rix <trix at redhat.com>
>> Sent: Thursday, July 7, 2022 6:21 AM
>> To: Chautru, Nicolas <nicolas.chautru at intel.com>; dev at dpdk.org;
>> thomas at monjalon.net; gakhil at marvell.com; hemant.agrawal at nxp.com
>> Cc: maxime.coquelin at redhat.com; mdr at ashroe.eu; Richardson, Bruce
>> <bruce.richardson at intel.com>; david.marchand at redhat.com;
>> stephen at networkplumber.org
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/7] drivers/baseband: update PMDs to expose queue
>> per operation
>>
>>
>> On 7/6/22 2:10 PM, Chautru, Nicolas wrote:
>>> Hi Tom,
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Tom Rix <trix at redhat.com>
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, July 6, 2022 9:15 AM
>>>> To: Chautru, Nicolas <nicolas.chautru at intel.com>; dev at dpdk.org;
>>>> thomas at monjalon.net; gakhil at marvell.com; hemant.agrawal at nxp.com
>>>> Cc: maxime.coquelin at redhat.com; mdr at ashroe.eu; Richardson, Bruce
>>>> <bruce.richardson at intel.com>; david.marchand at redhat.com;
>>>> stephen at networkplumber.org
>>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/7] drivers/baseband: update PMDs to expose
>>>> queue per operation
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 7/5/22 5:23 PM, Nicolas Chautru wrote:
>>>>> Add support in existing bbdev PMDs for the explicit number of queue
>>>>> and priority for each operation type configured on the device.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Chautru <nicolas.chautru at intel.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> drivers/baseband/acc100/rte_acc100_pmd.c | 29 +++++++++++++--
>> ----
>>>> ---
>>>>> drivers/baseband/fpga_5gnr_fec/rte_fpga_5gnr_fec.c | 8 ++++++
>>>>> drivers/baseband/fpga_lte_fec/fpga_lte_fec.c | 8 ++++++
>>>>> drivers/baseband/la12xx/bbdev_la12xx.c | 7 ++++++
>>>>> drivers/baseband/turbo_sw/bbdev_turbo_software.c | 11 ++++++++
>>>>> 5 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/baseband/acc100/rte_acc100_pmd.c
>>>>> b/drivers/baseband/acc100/rte_acc100_pmd.c
>>>>> index 17ba798..d568d0d 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/baseband/acc100/rte_acc100_pmd.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/baseband/acc100/rte_acc100_pmd.c
>>>>> @@ -966,6 +966,7 @@
>>>>> struct rte_bbdev_driver_info *dev_info)
>>>>> {
>>>>> struct acc100_device *d = dev->data->dev_private;
>>>>> + int i;
>>>>>
>>>>> static const struct rte_bbdev_op_cap bbdev_capabilities[] = {
>>>>> {
>>>>> @@ -1062,19 +1063,23 @@
>>>>> fetch_acc100_config(dev);
>>>>> dev_info->device_status = RTE_BBDEV_DEV_NOT_SUPPORTED;
>>>>>
>>>>> - /* This isn't ideal because it reports the maximum number of queues
>>>> but
>>>>> - * does not provide info on how many can be uplink/downlink or
>>>> different
>>>>> - * priorities
>>>>> - */
>>>>> - dev_info->max_num_queues =
>>>>> - d->acc100_conf.q_dl_5g.num_aqs_per_groups *
>>>>> - d->acc100_conf.q_dl_5g.num_qgroups +
>>>>> - d->acc100_conf.q_ul_5g.num_aqs_per_groups *
>>>>> - d->acc100_conf.q_ul_5g.num_qgroups +
>>>>> - d->acc100_conf.q_dl_4g.num_aqs_per_groups *
>>>>> - d->acc100_conf.q_dl_4g.num_qgroups +
>>>>> - d->acc100_conf.q_ul_4g.num_aqs_per_groups *
>>>>> + /* Expose number of queues */
>>>>> + dev_info->num_queues[RTE_BBDEV_OP_NONE] = 0;
>>>>> + dev_info->num_queues[RTE_BBDEV_OP_TURBO_DEC] =
>>>>> +d->acc100_conf.q_ul_4g.num_aqs_per_groups *
>>>>> d->acc100_conf.q_ul_4g.num_qgroups;
>>>>> + dev_info->num_queues[RTE_BBDEV_OP_TURBO_ENC] = d-
>>>>> acc100_conf.q_dl_4g.num_aqs_per_groups *
>>>>> + d->acc100_conf.q_dl_4g.num_qgroups;
>>>>> + dev_info->num_queues[RTE_BBDEV_OP_LDPC_DEC] = d-
>>>>> acc100_conf.q_ul_5g.num_aqs_per_groups *
>>>>> + d->acc100_conf.q_ul_5g.num_qgroups;
>>>>> + dev_info->num_queues[RTE_BBDEV_OP_LDPC_ENC] = d-
>>>>> acc100_conf.q_dl_5g.num_aqs_per_groups *
>>>>> + d->acc100_conf.q_dl_5g.num_qgroups;
>>>>> + dev_info->queue_priority[RTE_BBDEV_OP_TURBO_DEC] = d-
>>>>> acc100_conf.q_ul_4g.num_qgroups;
>>>>> + dev_info->queue_priority[RTE_BBDEV_OP_TURBO_ENC] = d-
>>>>> acc100_conf.q_dl_4g.num_qgroups;
>>>>> + dev_info->queue_priority[RTE_BBDEV_OP_LDPC_DEC] = d-
>>>>> acc100_conf.q_ul_5g.num_qgroups;
>>>>> + dev_info->queue_priority[RTE_BBDEV_OP_LDPC_ENC] = d-
>>>>> acc100_conf.q_dl_5g.num_qgroups;
>>>>> + dev_info->max_num_queues = 0;
>>>>> + for (i = RTE_BBDEV_OP_TURBO_DEC; i < RTE_BBDEV_OP_LDPC_ENC;
>>>> i++)
>>>>
>>>> should this be i <= ?
>>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>>>> + dev_info->max_num_queues += dev_info->num_queues[i];
>>>>> dev_info->queue_size_lim = ACC100_MAX_QUEUE_DEPTH;
>>>>> dev_info->hardware_accelerated = true;
>>>>> dev_info->max_dl_queue_priority = diff --git
>>>>> a/drivers/baseband/fpga_5gnr_fec/rte_fpga_5gnr_fec.c
>>>>> b/drivers/baseband/fpga_5gnr_fec/rte_fpga_5gnr_fec.c
>>>>> index 57b12af..b4982af 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/baseband/fpga_5gnr_fec/rte_fpga_5gnr_fec.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/baseband/fpga_5gnr_fec/rte_fpga_5gnr_fec.c
>>>>> @@ -379,6 +379,14 @@
>>>>> if (hw_q_id != FPGA_INVALID_HW_QUEUE_ID)
>>>>> dev_info->max_num_queues++;
>>>>> }
>>>>> + /* Expose number of queue per operation type */
>>>>> + dev_info->num_queues[RTE_BBDEV_OP_NONE] = 0;
>>>>> + dev_info->num_queues[RTE_BBDEV_OP_TURBO_DEC] = 0;
>>>>> + dev_info->num_queues[RTE_BBDEV_OP_TURBO_ENC] = 0;
>>>>> + dev_info->num_queues[RTE_BBDEV_OP_LDPC_DEC] = dev_info-
>>>>> max_num_queues / 2;
>>>>> + dev_info->num_queues[RTE_BBDEV_OP_LDPC_ENC] = dev_info-
>>>>> max_num_queues / 2;
>>>>> + dev_info->queue_priority[RTE_BBDEV_OP_LDPC_DEC] = 1;
>>>>> + dev_info->queue_priority[RTE_BBDEV_OP_LDPC_ENC] = 1;
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> /**
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/baseband/fpga_lte_fec/fpga_lte_fec.c
>>>>> b/drivers/baseband/fpga_lte_fec/fpga_lte_fec.c
>>>>> index 2a330c4..dc7f479 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/baseband/fpga_lte_fec/fpga_lte_fec.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/baseband/fpga_lte_fec/fpga_lte_fec.c
>>>>> @@ -655,6 +655,14 @@ struct __rte_cache_aligned fpga_queue {
>>>>> if (hw_q_id != FPGA_INVALID_HW_QUEUE_ID)
>>>>> dev_info->max_num_queues++;
>>>>> }
>>>>> + /* Expose number of queue per operation type */
>>>>> + dev_info->num_queues[RTE_BBDEV_OP_NONE] = 0;
>>>>> + dev_info->num_queues[RTE_BBDEV_OP_TURBO_DEC] = dev_info-
>>>>> max_num_queues / 2;
>>>>> + dev_info->num_queues[RTE_BBDEV_OP_TURBO_ENC] = dev_info-
>>>>> max_num_queues / 2;
>>>>> + dev_info->num_queues[RTE_BBDEV_OP_LDPC_DEC] = 0;
>>>>> + dev_info->num_queues[RTE_BBDEV_OP_LDPC_ENC] = 0;
>>>>> + dev_info->queue_priority[RTE_BBDEV_OP_TURBO_DEC] = 1;
>>>>> + dev_info->queue_priority[RTE_BBDEV_OP_TURBO_ENC] = 1;
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> /**
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/baseband/la12xx/bbdev_la12xx.c
>>>>> b/drivers/baseband/la12xx/bbdev_la12xx.c
>>>>> index c1f88c6..e99ea9a 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/baseband/la12xx/bbdev_la12xx.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/baseband/la12xx/bbdev_la12xx.c
>>>>> @@ -102,6 +102,13 @@ struct bbdev_la12xx_params {
>>>>> dev_info->min_alignment = 64;
>>>>> dev_info->device_status = RTE_BBDEV_DEV_NOT_SUPPORTED;
>>>>>
>>>>> + dev_info->num_queues[RTE_BBDEV_OP_NONE] = 0;
>>>>> + dev_info->num_queues[RTE_BBDEV_OP_TURBO_DEC] = 0;
>>>>> + dev_info->num_queues[RTE_BBDEV_OP_TURBO_ENC] = 0;
>>>>> + dev_info->num_queues[RTE_BBDEV_OP_LDPC_DEC] =
>>>> LA12XX_MAX_QUEUES / 2;
>>>>> + dev_info->num_queues[RTE_BBDEV_OP_LDPC_ENC] =
>>>> LA12XX_MAX_QUEUES / 2;
>>>>> + dev_info->queue_priority[RTE_BBDEV_OP_LDPC_DEC] = 1;
>>>>> + dev_info->queue_priority[RTE_BBDEV_OP_LDPC_ENC] = 1;
>>>>> rte_bbdev_log_debug("got device info from %u", dev->data->dev_id);
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/baseband/turbo_sw/bbdev_turbo_software.c
>>>>> b/drivers/baseband/turbo_sw/bbdev_turbo_software.c
>>>>> index dbc5524..647e706 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/baseband/turbo_sw/bbdev_turbo_software.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/baseband/turbo_sw/bbdev_turbo_software.c
>>>>> @@ -256,6 +256,17 @@ struct turbo_sw_queue {
>>>>> dev_info->data_endianness = RTE_LITTLE_ENDIAN;
>>>>> dev_info->device_status = RTE_BBDEV_DEV_NOT_SUPPORTED;
>>>>>
>>>>> + const struct rte_bbdev_op_cap *op_cap = bbdev_capabilities;
>>>> Should this be done through dev instead of assigning directly ?
>>> I am not sure I follow your suggestion. Do you mind clarifying?
>> bbdev_capabilites is a const defined in this function, do you really need to loop
>> over it to find information that is constant ?
> I still miss your point. Note that this constant is not always the same at build time (based on what SDK it can links to).
> What would suggest?
Operations that can be done at compile time, should be. Useless there
is a good reason.
You need to provide a good reason or make the change.
Tom
>
> Thanks
> Nic
>
>
>> Tom
>>
>>>> Tom
>>>>
>>>>> + int num_op_type = 0;
>>>>> + for (; op_cap->type != RTE_BBDEV_OP_NONE; ++op_cap)
>>>>> + num_op_type++;
>>>>> + op_cap = bbdev_capabilities;
>>>>> + if (num_op_type > 0) {
>>>>> + int num_queue_per_type = dev_info->max_num_queues /
>>>> num_op_type;
>>>>> + for (; op_cap->type != RTE_BBDEV_OP_NONE; ++op_cap)
>>>>> + dev_info->num_queues[op_cap->type] =
>>>> num_queue_per_type;
>>>>> + }
>>>>> +
>>>>> rte_bbdev_log_debug("got device info from %u\n", dev->data-
>>>>> dev_id);
>>>>> }
>>>>>
More information about the dev
mailing list