[PATCH v1 00/10] baseband/acc200

[Vargas, Hernan]

Hi Tom,

The patch series for the ACC200 can wait until Nic's back.
Our priority are the changes for the bbdev API here: https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=23912

Thanks,
Hernan

-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Rix <trix at redhat.com> 
Sent: Sunday, July 17, 2022 8:08 AM
To: Vargas, Hernan <hernan.vargas at intel.com>; Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin at redhat.com>; Chautru, Nicolas <nicolas.chautru at intel.com>; dev at dpdk.org; thomas at monjalon.net; gakhil at marvell.com; hemant.agrawal at nxp.com
Cc: mdr at ashroe.eu; Richardson, Bruce <bruce.richardson at intel.com>; david.marchand at redhat.com; stephen at networkplumber.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 00/10] baseband/acc200


On 7/14/22 11:49 AM, Vargas, Hernan wrote:
> Hi Tom, Maxime,
>
> Could you please review the v5 series that Nic submitted last week?
> https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=23912
>
> Thanks,
> Hernan

Hernan,

For this patch series for the acc200, will you be able to refactor it so acc has a common base ?

Or will this be on hold until Nic is back ?

Tom

>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin at redhat.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2022 8:49 AM
> To: Chautru, Nicolas <nicolas.chautru at intel.com>; dev at dpdk.org; 
> thomas at monjalon.net; gakhil at marvell.com; hemant.agrawal at nxp.com; 
> trix at redhat.com; Vargas, Hernan <hernan.vargas at intel.com>
> Cc: mdr at ashroe.eu; Richardson, Bruce <bruce.richardson at intel.com>; 
> david.marchand at redhat.com; stephen at networkplumber.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 00/10] baseband/acc200
>
> Hi Nicolas, Hernan,
>
> (Adding Hernan in the recipients list)
>
> On 7/8/22 02:01, Nicolas Chautru wrote:
>> This is targeting 22.11 and includes the PMD for the integrated 
>> accelerator on Intel Xeon SPR-EEC.
>> There is a dependency on that parallel serie still in-flight which 
>> extends the bbdev api
>> https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=23894
>>
>> I will be offline for a few weeks for the summer break but Hernan 
>> will cover for me during that time if required.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Nic
>>
>> Nicolas Chautru (10):
>>     baseband/acc200: introduce PMD for ACC200
>>     baseband/acc200: add HW register definitions
>>     baseband/acc200: add info get function
>>     baseband/acc200: add queue configuration
>>     baseband/acc200: add LDPC processing functions
>>     baseband/acc200: add LTE processing functions
>>     baseband/acc200: add support for FFT operations
>>     baseband/acc200: support interrupt
>>     baseband/acc200: add device status and vf2pf comms
>>     baseband/acc200: add PF configure companion function
>>
>>    MAINTAINERS                              |    3 +
>>    app/test-bbdev/meson.build               |    3 +
>>    app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c         |   76 +
>>    doc/guides/bbdevs/acc200.rst             |  244 ++
>>    doc/guides/bbdevs/index.rst              |    1 +
>>    drivers/baseband/acc200/acc200_pf_enum.h |  468 +++
>>    drivers/baseband/acc200/acc200_pmd.h     |  690 ++++
>>    drivers/baseband/acc200/acc200_vf_enum.h |   89 +
>>    drivers/baseband/acc200/meson.build      |    8 +
>>    drivers/baseband/acc200/rte_acc200_cfg.h |  115 +
>>    drivers/baseband/acc200/rte_acc200_pmd.c | 5403 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>    drivers/baseband/acc200/version.map      |   10 +
>>    drivers/baseband/meson.build             |    1 +
>>    13 files changed, 7111 insertions(+)
>>    create mode 100644 doc/guides/bbdevs/acc200.rst
>>    create mode 100644 drivers/baseband/acc200/acc200_pf_enum.h
>>    create mode 100644 drivers/baseband/acc200/acc200_pmd.h
>>    create mode 100644 drivers/baseband/acc200/acc200_vf_enum.h
>>    create mode 100644 drivers/baseband/acc200/meson.build
>>    create mode 100644 drivers/baseband/acc200/rte_acc200_cfg.h
>>    create mode 100644 drivers/baseband/acc200/rte_acc200_pmd.c
>>    create mode 100644 drivers/baseband/acc200/version.map
>>
> Comparing ACC200 & ACC100 header files, I understand ACC200 is an evolution of the ACC10x family. The FEC bits are really close, ACC200 main addition seems to be FFT acceleration which could be handled in ACC10x driver based on device ID.
>
> I think both drivers have to be merged in order to avoid code duplication. That's how other families of devices (e.g. i40e) are handled.
>
> Thanks,
> Maxime
>