[PATCH v1] bbdev: add device status info

[Stephen Hemminger]

On Tue, 7 Jun 2022 18:20:38 +0200
Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin at redhat.com> wrote:

> Hi Nicolas,
> 
> On 6/7/22 17:44, Chautru, Nicolas wrote:
> > Hi Maxime,
> >   
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin at redhat.com>
> >> Sent: Tuesday, June 7, 2022 5:43 AM
> >> To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen at networkplumber.org>; Chautru, Nicolas
> >> <nicolas.chautru at intel.com>
> >> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; gakhil at marvell.com; trix at redhat.com;
> >> hemant.agrawal at nxp.com; Vargas, Hernan <hernan.vargas at intel.com>
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] bbdev: add device status info
> >>
> >> Hi Stephen,
> >>
> >> On 6/7/22 02:09, Stephen Hemminger wrote:  
> >>> On Mon,  6 Jun 2022 15:50:08 -0700
> >>> Nicolas Chautru <nicolas.chautru at intel.com> wrote:
> >>>  
> >>>> @@ -298,6 +313,8 @@ struct rte_bbdev_driver_info {
> >>>>    	const struct rte_bbdev_op_cap *capabilities;
> >>>>    	/** Device cpu_flag requirements */
> >>>>    	const enum rte_cpu_flag_t *cpu_flag_reqs;
> >>>> +	/** Device Status */
> >>>> +	enum rte_bbdev_device_status device_status;
> >>>>    };
> >>>>  
> >>>
> >>> This ends up being an ABI breakage, can't change a struct like that
> >>> until 22.11 release.
> >>>  
> >>
> >> Indeed, but Nicolas mentioned in the cover-letter that the patch targets
> >> v22.11; not this release.
> >>
> >> However, a deprecation notice should be sent for v22.07 if it hasn't been
> >> done yet.  
> > 
> > I have sent this deprecation Maxime:
> > https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/1647542252-35727-2-git-send-email-nicolas.chautru@intel.com/
> > Do you believe this needs to be extended to cover more details the change and including this device status info explicitly? I can update the verbiage in more details if required  
> 
> Thanks for the pointer, I missed it.
> Reading the deprecation notice, it is not clear to me it is about the
> device status info enum.
> 
> Maybe rewording it a bit to be more specific would help.

You might want to use one the existing empty padding slots (holes) in
that structure. It appears to have been laid out haphazardly.