[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/8] net/bnxt: allow Tx only or Rx only configs in PMD

Ferruh Yigit ferruh.yigit at xilinx.com
Tue Jun 21 09:57:05 CEST 2022


On 6/21/2022 5:54 AM, Damodharam Ammepalli wrote:
> Hi Ferruh,
> 
> Please see my inline responses [Damo];
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Damo
> 
> *From:*Kalesh Anakkur Purayil <kalesh-anakkur.purayil at broadcom.com>
> *Sent:* Monday, June 20, 2022 9:47 PM
> *To:* Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit at xilinx.com>; Damodharam Ammepalli 
> <damodharam.ammepalli at broadcom.com>
> *Cc:* Ajit Kumar Khaparde <ajit.khaparde at broadcom.com>; dpdk-dev 
> <dev at dpdk.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/8] net/bnxt: allow Tx only or Rx only 
> configs in PMD
> 
> Hi Damo,
> 
> Could you please respond to Ferruh's question?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Kalesh
> 
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 10:33 PM Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit at xilinx.com 
> <mailto:ferruh.yigit at xilinx.com>> wrote:
> 
>     On 6/15/2022 3:56 PM, Kalesh A P wrote:
> 
>      >
>      > From: Damodharam Ammepalli <damodharam.ammepall at broadcom.com
>     <mailto:damodharam.ammepall at broadcom.com>>
>      >
>      > Currently, we fail the init/probe of pmd if
>     eth_dev->data->nb_tx_queues
>      > or eth_dev->data->nb_rx_queues is 0. We are removing this check.
>      >
> 
>     Is there a valid usecase for Rx only or Tx only config?
>     I assume testpmd doesn't support it, how are you testing this?
>     [Damo]:
> 
>     Yes. There is a valid use case. We are trying to address a
> 
>     customer request, to deploy an application in Rxonly mode.
> 

OK, I just want to confirm this is a valid usecase.

>     This is the sample testpmd command we used in our unit tests.
> 
>     ./build/app/dpdk-testpmd -c 0xff  -n 4 --log-level="pmd.",7
> 
>     --socket-mem 0,1024  -- --forward-mode=rxonly --txq=0 -i
> 

Got it, testpmd 'rxonly', and possibly 'txonly', mode is working.

>     We can update the commit headline to indicate Rx only configuration to
> 
>     prevent misunderstanding.
> 
>     Please let me know and we will address accordingly.
> 

I think it is OK as it is, thanks for clarification.

> 
>      > Fixes: daef48efe5e5 ("net/bnxt: support set MTU")
>      > Cc: stable at dpdk.org <mailto:stable at dpdk.org>
>      >
>      > Signed-off-by: Damodharam Ammepalli
>     <damodharam.ammepall at broadcom.com
>     <mailto:damodharam.ammepall at broadcom.com>>
>      > Reviewed-by: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde at broadcom.com
>     <mailto:ajit.khaparde at broadcom.com>>
>      > Reviewed-by: Somnath Kotur <somnath.kotur at broadcom.com
>     <mailto:somnath.kotur at broadcom.com>>
>      > ---
>      >   drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_ethdev.c | 7 +------
>      >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
>      >
>      > diff --git a/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_ethdev.c
>     b/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_ethdev.c
>      > index 34f2149..8181e1f 100644
>      > --- a/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_ethdev.c
>      > +++ b/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_ethdev.c
>      > @@ -723,7 +723,7 @@ static int bnxt_alloc_prev_ring_stats(struct
>     bnxt *bp)
>      >                                               sizeof(struct
>     bnxt_ring_stats) *
>      >                                               bp->tx_cp_nr_rings,
>      >                                               0);
>      > -       if (bp->prev_tx_ring_stats == NULL)
>      > +       if (bp->tx_cp_nr_rings > 0 && bp->prev_tx_ring_stats == NULL)
>      >                  goto error;
>      >
>      >          return 0;
>      > @@ -1567,11 +1567,6 @@ int bnxt_dev_start_op(struct rte_eth_dev
>     *eth_dev)
>      >          int vlan_mask = 0;
>      >          int rc, retry_cnt = BNXT_IF_CHANGE_RETRY_COUNT;
>      >
>      > -       if (!eth_dev->data->nb_tx_queues ||
>     !eth_dev->data->nb_rx_queues) {
>      > -               PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "Queues are not configured yet!\n");
>      > -               return -EINVAL;
>      > -       }
>      > -
>      >          if (bp->rx_cp_nr_rings > RTE_ETHDEV_QUEUE_STAT_CNTRS)
>      >                  PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR,
>      >                              "RxQ cnt %d >
>     RTE_ETHDEV_QUEUE_STAT_CNTRS %d\n",
>      > --
>      > 2.10.1
>      >
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Kalesh A P
> 
> 
> This electronic communication and the information and any files 
> transmitted with it, or attached to it, are confidential and are 
> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is 
> addressed and may contain information that is confidential, legally 
> privileged, protected by privacy laws, or otherwise restricted from 
> disclosure to anyone else. If you are not the intended recipient or the 
> person responsible for delivering the e-mail to the intended recipient, 
> you are hereby notified that any use, copying, distributing, 
> dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this e-mail is 
> strictly prohibited. If you received this e-mail in error, please return 
> the e-mail to the sender, delete it from your computer, and destroy any 
> printed copy of it.



More information about the dev mailing list