[PATCH v2] app/testpmd : fix testpmd quit error

[Wu, WenxuanX]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yigit at intel.com>
> Sent: 2022年3月5日 0:19
> To: Wu, WenxuanX <wenxuanx.wu at intel.com>; Yang, Qiming
> <qiming.yang at intel.com>; Zhang, Qi Z <qi.z.zhang at intel.com>; Li, Xiaoyun
> <xiaoyun.li at intel.com>; Singh, Aman Deep <aman.deep.singh at intel.com>;
> Zhang, Yuying <yuying.zhang at intel.com>
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] app/testpmd : fix testpmd quit error
> 
> On 3/4/2022 2:37 AM, wenxuanx.wu at intel.com wrote:
> > From: wenxuan wu <wenxuanx.wu at intel.com>
> >
> > When testpmd use func get_eth_dev_info() while related resource had
> > been released.
> >
> 
> Is 'eth_dev_info_get_print_err()' fails at this stage?
> What resource is released, the 'slave_port' itself?
Yeah, 1PF ,2VF_repr.
Close port pf ,ok.
Close port vf , error.
In port_close() func, 
   Is_bonding_slave() call eth_dev_info_get_print_err() to confirm whether it is a slave or not , but when port is a vf port ,and  pf had been released, this eth_dev_info_get_print_err(vf_id) would read a freed memory ,result in this bug.
> 
> And there may be another logic wrong, it shouldn't try to detect if a released
> port is bonding port or not.
> 
> > Change the logic of func port_is_bonding_slave, this func
> > eth_dev_info_get_print_err while pf is released would result in this
> > error. Use ports instead to avoid this bug.
> >
> 
> This relies to application level stored value to decide about port, not sure if
> this is reliable.
> 
> > Fixes: 0a0821bcf312 ("app/testpmd: remove most uses of internal ethdev
> > array")
> > Cc: stable at dpdk.org
> >
> > Signed-off-by: wenxuan wu <wenxuanx.wu at intel.com>
> > ---
> >   app/test-pmd/testpmd.c | 12 +-----------
> >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c index
> > e1da961311..37038c9183 100644
> > --- a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c
> > +++ b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c
> > @@ -3824,19 +3824,9 @@ void clear_port_slave_flag(portid_t slave_pid)
> >   uint8_t port_is_bonding_slave(portid_t slave_pid)
> >   {
> >   	struct rte_port *port;
> > -	struct rte_eth_dev_info dev_info;
> > -	int ret;
> >
> >   	port = &ports[slave_pid];
> > -	ret = eth_dev_info_get_print_err(slave_pid, &dev_info);
> > -	if (ret != 0) {
> > -		TESTPMD_LOG(ERR,
> > -			"Failed to get device info for port id %d,"
> > -			"cannot determine if the port is a bonded slave",
> > -			slave_pid);
> > -		return 0;
> > -	}
> > -	if ((*dev_info.dev_flags & RTE_ETH_DEV_BONDED_SLAVE) || (port-
> >slave_flag == 1))
> > +	if ((*port->dev_info.dev_flags & RTE_ETH_DEV_BONDED_SLAVE) ||
> > +(port->slave_flag == 1))
> >   		return 1;
> >   	return 0;
> >   }