[Bug 976] rte_rib (and rte_rib6) do not handle /0 correctly
Stephen Hemminger
stephen at networkplumber.org
Thu Mar 24 00:38:06 CET 2022
On Wed, 23 Mar 2022 22:46:02 +0000
bugzilla at dpdk.org wrote:
> https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=976
>
> Bug ID: 976
> Summary: rte_rib (and rte_rib6) do not handle /0 correctly
> Product: DPDK
> Version: 21.11
> Hardware: All
> OS: All
> Status: UNCONFIRMED
> Severity: normal
> Priority: Normal
> Component: other
> Assignee: dev at dpdk.org
> Reporter: stephen at networkplumber.org
> Target Milestone: ---
>
> The function rte_rib_insert() allows inserting 0/0 as a default route, but it
> is not correctly handled by the current tree code. For example lookups will
> never match the default route and tree traversal never finds this default
> route.
>
> Same bug probably exists in rte_rib6
>
Here is a patch to existing RIB test that tests boundary conditions.
It shows that /0 and /32 work correctly for lookup, it is just the
tree traversal that is problematic.
diff --git a/app/test/test_rib.c b/app/test/test_rib.c
index 06058f8f7c52..403fc85efe95 100644
--- a/app/test/test_rib.c
+++ b/app/test/test_rib.c
@@ -307,6 +307,79 @@ test_basic(void)
return TEST_SUCCESS;
}
+/*
+ * Call insert for successive depths from 0 to 32
+ * and then make sure we get the most specific rule.
+ */
+static int32_t
+test_depth(void)
+{
+ struct rte_rib *rib = NULL;
+ struct rte_rib_node *node;
+ const struct rte_rib_conf config = {
+ .max_nodes = MAX_RULES,
+ };
+ const uint32_t ip = RTE_IPV4(192, 18, 10, 1);
+ uint64_t next_hop_add = 0;
+ uint64_t next_hop_return;
+ uint8_t depth;
+ int ret;
+
+ rib = rte_rib_create(__func__, SOCKET_ID_ANY, &config);
+ RTE_TEST_ASSERT(rib != NULL, "Failed to create RIB\n");
+
+ for (depth = 0; depth <= MAX_DEPTH; depth++) {
+ node = rte_rib_insert(rib, ip, depth);
+ RTE_TEST_ASSERT(node != NULL, "Failed to insert rule\n");
+
+ ret = rte_rib_set_nh(node, next_hop_add);
+ RTE_TEST_ASSERT(ret == 0,
+ "Failed to set rte_rib_node field\n");
+
+ node = rte_rib_lookup_exact(rib, ip, depth);
+ RTE_TEST_ASSERT(node != NULL,
+ "Failed to lookup\n");
+
+ ret = rte_rib_get_nh(node, &next_hop_return);
+ RTE_TEST_ASSERT((ret == 0) && (next_hop_add == next_hop_return),
+ "Failed to get proper nexthop\n");
+ ++next_hop_add;
+ }
+
+ /* depth = 33 = MAX_DEPTH + 1 */
+ do {
+ uint32_t this_ip;
+ uint8_t this_depth;
+
+ --depth;
+
+ node = rte_rib_lookup(rib, ip);
+ RTE_TEST_ASSERT(node != NULL, "Failed to lookup\n");
+
+ ret = rte_rib_get_nh(node, &next_hop_return);
+ RTE_TEST_ASSERT((ret == 0) && (depth == next_hop_return),
+ "Failed to get proper nexthop\n");
+
+ ret = rte_rib_get_depth(node, &this_depth);
+ RTE_TEST_ASSERT((ret == 0) && (this_depth == depth),
+ "Failed to get proper depth\n");
+
+ ret = rte_rib_get_ip(node, &this_ip);
+ RTE_TEST_ASSERT(ret == 0, "Failed to get ip\n");
+
+ rte_rib_remove(rib, this_ip, this_depth);
+ } while (depth != 0);
+
+ /* all rules removed should return NULL now */
+ node = rte_rib_lookup(rib, ip);
+ RTE_TEST_ASSERT(node == NULL,
+ "Lookup returns non existent rule\n");
+
+ rte_rib_free(rib);
+
+ return TEST_SUCCESS;
+}
+
int32_t
test_tree_traversal(void)
{
@@ -314,9 +387,17 @@ test_tree_traversal(void)
struct rte_rib_node *node;
struct rte_rib_conf config;
- uint32_t ip1 = RTE_IPV4(10, 10, 10, 0);
- uint32_t ip2 = RTE_IPV4(10, 10, 130, 80);
- uint8_t depth = 30;
+ uint32_t ips[] = {
+ RTE_IPV4(0, 0, 0, 0), /* /0 */
+ RTE_IPV4(10, 10, 0, 0), /* /8 */
+ RTE_IPV4(10, 11, 0, 0), /* /16 */
+ RTE_IPV4(10, 10, 130, 0), /* /24 */
+ RTE_IPV4(10, 10, 130, 9), /* /32 */
+ };
+ unsigned int count;
+ uint32_t ip;
+ uint8_t depth;
+ int ret;
config.max_nodes = MAX_RULES;
config.ext_sz = 0;
@@ -324,16 +405,44 @@ test_tree_traversal(void)
rib = rte_rib_create(__func__, SOCKET_ID_ANY, &config);
RTE_TEST_ASSERT(rib != NULL, "Failed to create RIB\n");
- node = rte_rib_insert(rib, ip1, depth);
- RTE_TEST_ASSERT(node != NULL, "Failed to insert rule\n");
+ for (count = 0; count < RTE_DIM(ips); count++) {
+ depth = count * 8;
- node = rte_rib_insert(rib, ip2, depth);
- RTE_TEST_ASSERT(node != NULL, "Failed to insert rule\n");
+ node = rte_rib_insert(rib, ips[count], depth);
+ RTE_TEST_ASSERT(node != NULL, "Failed to insert rule\n");
+
+ ret = rte_rib_get_ip(node, &ip);
+ RTE_TEST_ASSERT(ret == 0, "Failed to get ip\n");
+
+ printf("%u: insert [%p] %u.%u.%u.%u/%u\n",
+ count, node,
+ (ip >> 24) & 0xff,
+ (ip >> 16) & 0xff,
+ (ip >> 8) & 0xff,
+ ip & 0xff, depth);
+ }
+ /* Expect to be able to traverse to all nodes */
node = NULL;
- node = rte_rib_get_nxt(rib, RTE_IPV4(10, 10, 130, 0), 24, node,
- RTE_RIB_GET_NXT_ALL);
- RTE_TEST_ASSERT(node != NULL, "Failed to get rib_node\n");
+ for (count = 0; count < RTE_DIM(ips); count++) {
+
+ node = rte_rib_get_nxt(rib, 0, 0,
+ node, RTE_RIB_GET_NXT_ALL);
+ RTE_TEST_ASSERT(node != NULL, "Failed to get rib_node\n");
+
+ ret = rte_rib_get_ip(node, &ip);
+ RTE_TEST_ASSERT(ret == 0, "Failed to get ip\n");
+
+ ret = rte_rib_get_depth(node, &depth);
+ RTE_TEST_ASSERT(ret == 0, "Failed to get depth\n");
+
+ printf("%u: walk [%p] %u.%u.%u.%u/%u\n",
+ count, node,
+ (ip >> 24) & 0xff,
+ (ip >> 16) & 0xff,
+ (ip >> 8) & 0xff,
+ ip & 0xff, depth);
+ }
rte_rib_free(rib);
@@ -350,6 +459,7 @@ static struct unit_test_suite rib_tests = {
TEST_CASE(test_insert_invalid),
TEST_CASE(test_get_fn),
TEST_CASE(test_basic),
+ TEST_CASE(test_depth),
TEST_CASE(test_tree_traversal),
TEST_CASES_END()
}
More information about the dev
mailing list